Data from: Shared decision-making as a cost-containment strategy: US physician reactions from a cross-sectional survey

Objective: To assess US physicians’ attitudes towards using shared
decision-making (SDM) to achieve cost containment. Design: Cross-sectional
mailed survey. Setting: US medical practice. Participants: 3897 physicians
were randomly selected from the AMA Physician Masterfile. Of these, 2556
completed the survey. Main outcome measures: Level of enthusiasm for
“Promoting better conversations with patients as a means of lowering
healthcare costs”; degree of agreement with “Decision support tools that
show costs would be helpful in my practice” and agreement with “should
promoting SDM be legislated to control overall healthcare costs”. Results:
Of 2556 respondents (response rate (RR) 65%), two-thirds (67%) were ‘very
enthusiastic’ about promoting SDM as a means of reducing healthcare costs.
Most (70%) agreed decision support tools that show costs would be helpful
in their practice, but only 24% agreed with legislating SDM to control
costs. Compared with physicians with billing-only compensation,
respondents with salary compensation were more likely to strongly agree
that decision support tools showing costs would be helpful (OR 1.4; 95% CI
1.1 to 1.7). Primary care physicians (vs surgeons, OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0 to
1.6) expressed more enthusiasm for SDM being legislated as a means to
address healthcare costs. Conclusions: Most US physicians express
enthusiasm about using SDM to help contain costs. They believe decision
support tools that show costs would be useful. Few agree that SDM should
be legislated as a means to control healthcare costs.