Appendix A. Figures showing the species-level movement distances calculated from the recapture data, observed yearly reproductive effort for individuals of each species from the field study, PCA biplot with confidence ellipses for phylogenetic relatedness at the family level, apparent survival estimates (Φ) shown against the log(Y+1) distance (benchmark) moved for each species and probability of moving a relatively long distance (ψ) as estimated using RMark, and movement estimates...

Figures showing the species-level movement distances calculated from the recapture data, observed yearly reproductive effort for individuals of each species from the field study, PCA biplot with confidence ellipses for phylogenetic relatedness at the family level, apparent survival estimates (Φ) shown against the log(Y+1) distance (benchmark) moved for each species and probability of moving a relatively long distance (ψ) as estimated using RMark, and movement estimates (benchmark, ψ) shown against fecundity for each species. Evidence for a reproduction-movement trade-off is not statistically significant.

本数据集包含以下图表：基于重捕数据计算得到的物种水平移动距离可视化结果；野外研究中观测得到的各物种种个体的年度繁殖投入情况；针对科水平系统发育亲缘关系的主成分分析（Principal Component Analysis, PCA）双序图及置信椭圆；各物种种的表观存活估计值（Φ）与经log(Y+1)转换的移动距离（基准值）的对应关系、以及使用RMark软件估计的物种长距离移动概率（ψ）；各物种种的移动估计值（基准值ψ）与繁殖力的对应关系。研究表明，繁殖-移动权衡的统计学显著性证据不足。