Supplementary Tables.

Table A: Sampling sites of NFNB. Table B: Read counts. Number of raw reads before and after filtering for quality, length and PCR duplicates. Also shown is percentage of reads mapped to the reference genome and mean coverage per isolate across the genome. Table C: Pairwise Wilcoxon test to assess significant differences in genetic diversity levels between P. teres f. teres populations. Table D: Pairwise Wilcoxon test to assess significant differences in Tajima’s D between P. teres f. teres populations. Table E: Proportion of each mating type per population. Table F: Cross-validation error over 10 replicate runs, the average error per K-value and the standard deviation. Table G: Overview of scenario groups used in the three DIYABC-RF analyses. Table H: Overview of random forest vote results for each of the three ABC-RF analyses performed for individual scenarios and scenario groups. Table I: Estimations of splitting time between P. teres f. teres populations. Table J: Genomic regions that have undergone a recent selective sweep for the Middle Eastern population. The reported regions have been identified by three independent methods (see Methods). Table K: Genomic regions that have undergone a recent selective sweep for the North American population. The reported regions have been identified by three independent methods (see Methods). Table L: Genomic regions that have undergone a recent selective sweep for North African population. The reported regions have been identified by three independent methods (see Methods). Table M: Genomic regions that have undergone a recent selective sweep for the Caucasian population. The reported regions have been identified by three independent methods (see Methods). Table N: Genomic regions that have undergone a recent selective sweep for the Californian population. The reported regions have been identified by three independent methods (see Methods. Table O: Genomic regions that have undergone a recent selective sweep for the North and Central European population. The reported regions have been identified by three independent methods (see Methods). Table P: Pairwise population divergence estimates (Fst) of P. teres f. teres populations.
(XLSX)