ECIN Replication Package for "Underpowered studies and exaggerated effects: A replication and re-evaluation of the magnitude of anchoring effects"

This is data and code accompanying the article "Underpowered studies and exaggerated effects: A replication and re-evaluation of the magnitude of anchoring effects." We reconsider one of the most widely studied behavioral biases: anchoring effects. We estimate that study designs in this literature, including replication studies, routinely fail to achieve statistical power of more than 30%. This study replicates an anchoring study that reported an effect size of a 31% increase in participants’ bids. In the replication, we increased the design’s statistical power from 46% to 96%, reducing the average exaggeration of a statistically significant result by a factor of seven. Our replication results reject the size of the original estimated effects. We find an estimated effect of 3.4% (95% CI [-3.4%, 10%]).