Laboratory vs wild populations: The importance of population origin in aquatic ecotoxicology

This dataset contains the raw data used in the accepted study "<b>Laboratory vs wild populations: The importance of population origin in aquatic ecotoxicology</b>" in Environmental Science and Pollution Research. In this study, we assess how the origin of the aquatic populations employed in ecotoxicology bioassays ("wild populations" coming from nature and "laboratory populations" from cultures) influences the sensitivities to organic and metal toxicants obtained. We found a general trend of lower sensitivity of wild populations to toxicants than laboratory populations, although sensitivity was dependent on species and toxicant groups.<br><br>In the data set, effective concentrations are available for wild and laboratory aquatic populations of the same species-genus and with the same endpoint, family compound, and exposure time (with a maximum difference of 2 exposure days between both populations), as well as the ratios (effective concentration of wild populations / effective concentration of laboratory populations) used in the analyses. Data were retrieved from the ECOTOX database after the proper refinement.本数据集包含已被期刊《Environmental Science and Pollution Research》（《环境科学与污染研究》）收录的、标题为<b>《实验室种群与野生种群：种群起源在水生生态毒理学中的重要性》</b>的研究论文中所使用的原始数据。本研究评估了水生生态毒理学生物测试中所采用的水生种群的起源——即源自自然环境的“野生种群”与源自实验室培养的“实验室种群”——对所测得的有机毒物与金属毒物敏感性的影响。研究发现，尽管毒物敏感性因物种与毒物类别而异，但总体而言野生种群对毒物的敏感性低于实验室种群。 本数据集收录了同属同种的野生与实验室水生种群的有效浓度数据，且二者具有相同的测试终点、化合物类别与暴露时间（两组种群的暴露天数最大差值不超过2天），同时包含了分析所用的比值数据（野生种群有效浓度/实验室种群有效浓度）。所有数据经合理筛选后，从ECOTOX数据库中提取得到。