five

Use of the Wasserman equation in optimization of the duration of the power ramp in a cardiopulmonary exercise test: a study of Brazilian men

收藏
DataCite Commons2020-08-27 更新2024-07-27 收录
下载链接:
https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/Use_of_the_Wasserman_equation_in_optimization_of_the_duration_of_the_power_ramp_in_a_cardiopulmonary_exercise_test_a_study_of_Brazilian_men/7898513/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
This study aimed to analyze the agreement between measurements of unloaded oxygen uptake and peak oxygen uptake based on equations proposed by Wasserman and on real measurements directly obtained with the ergospirometry system. We performed an incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), which was applied to two groups of sedentary male subjects: one apparently healthy group (HG, n=12) and the other had stable coronary artery disease (n=16). The mean age in the HG was 47±4 years and that in the coronary artery disease group (CG) was 57±8 years. Both groups performed CPET on a cycle ergometer with a ramp-type protocol at an intensity that was calculated according to the Wasserman equation. In the HG, there was no significant difference between measurements predicted by the formula and real measurements obtained in CPET in the unloaded condition. However, at peak effort, a significant difference was observed between oxygen uptake ( V ˙O2)peak(predicted) and V ˙O2peak(real) (nonparametric Wilcoxon test). In the CG, there was a significant difference of 116.26 mL/min between the predicted values by the formula and the real values obtained in the unloaded condition. A significant difference in peak effort was found, where V ˙O2peak(real) was 40% lower than V ˙O2peak(predicted) (nonparametric Wilcoxon test). There was no agreement between the real and predicted measurements as analyzed by Lin’s coefficient or the Bland and Altman model. The Wasserman formula does not appear to be appropriate for prediction of functional capacity of volunteers. Therefore, this formula cannot precisely predict the increase in power in incremental CPET on a cycle ergometer.

本研究旨在对比基于Wasserman公式计算的无负荷摄氧量、峰值摄氧量与直接采用运动心肺功能测试仪(ergospirometry)实测得到的对应指标间的一致性。本研究对两组久坐男性受试者开展了递增负荷心肺运动试验(incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test, CPET):一组为外观健康组(HG,n=12),另一组为稳定型冠状动脉疾病组(CG,n=16)。健康组受试者的平均年龄为47±4岁,冠状动脉疾病组为57±8岁。两组受试者均在功率自行车上采用斜坡式负荷方案完成CPET,负荷强度依据Wasserman公式计算确定。在健康组中,无负荷状态下公式预测值与CPET实测值无显著差异。但在峰值运动状态下,采用非参数Wilcoxon检验分析发现,预测峰值摄氧量(V̇O2peak(predicted))与实测峰值摄氧量(V̇O2peak(real))之间存在显著差异。在冠状动脉疾病组中,无负荷状态下公式预测值与CPET实测值间的差值达116.26 mL/min,具有统计学显著性。峰值运动状态下同样存在显著差异,经非参数Wilcoxon检验证实,实测峰值摄氧量较预测值低40%。采用Lin一致性系数与Bland-Altman模型分析发现,实测值与预测值之间不存在一致性。Wasserman公式似乎并不适用于预测受试者的运动功能储备能力。因此,该公式无法精准预测功率自行车递增负荷CPET中的功率增幅。
提供机构:
SciELO journals
创建时间:
2019-03-27
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务