Confocal microscopy data associated with "Aphid effectors suppress plant immunity via recruiting defence proteins to processing bodies"

Confocal microscopy data associated with a future submission of paper “Aphid effectors suppress plant immunity via recruiting defence proteins to processing bodies” (Liu et al., 2025). This is an updated version for the bioRxiv paper Liu et al. (2024) (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.20.624400v1), which corresponds to an earlier dataset release in Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/14450693). The dataset here corresponds to a future updated version Liu et al. (2025). A manuscript using the dataset herein is in revision for publication in a journal. Subcellular localization Colocalization analysis using confocal microscopy Colocalization analysis was conducted by co-expression of different fluorescence protein-tagged proteins in N. benthamiana epidermal cells or A. thaliana protoplasts followed by observation with a Leica TCS SP8X upright confocal laser scanning microscope. Please refer to Liu et al. (2024) for full methods. Figure 2. CathB6 forms mobile puncta and colocalizes with processing body markers VCS, DCP5 and DCP1 in N. benthamiana leaf cells. Figure2_A-D.lif Fig.2A: Confocal images of CathB6-GFP-induced puncta. Fig.2B: Time-lapse confocal images of a CathB6-GFP puncta fusion. Fig.2C: Confocal images of CathB6-GFP colocalization with VCS-mCherry and intensity profiles below the images indicating overlap. Fig.2D: Confocal images of CathB6-GFP colocalization with DCP5-mCherry, DCP1-RFP, and intensity profiles below the images indicating overlap. Figure2_E-F.lif Fig.2_E-F: Analysis of VCS-mCherry puncta size distributions in the presence of GFP or CathB6-GFP. Figure 3. CathB6 interacts with EDS1 and relocates EDS1, PAD4 and ADR1 to p-bodies. Figure3_C-F.lif Fig.3C: Confocal images illustrating EDS1-mCherry localized in puncta with CathB6-GFP. Fig.3D: Confocal images illustrating colocalization of EDS1-GFP and VCS-mCherry with HA-CathB6. Fig.3E: Confocal images illustrating colocalization of EDS1-GFP and PAD4-mCherry in puncta with HA-CathB6. Fig.3F: Confocal images illustrating colocalization of EDS1-GFP and ADR1-L1-mCherry in puncta with Flag-PAD4 and HA-CathB6. Figure 5. Acd28.9 counteracts CathB6 recruitment of EDS1 to p-bodies and contributes to plant resistance against aphids. Figure5_B-C.lif Fig.5B: Confocal images illustrating Acd28.9-mCherry co-expression depletes CathB6-GFP puncta in N. benthamiana. Fig.5C: Confocal images illustrating EDS1-GFP forms puncta with HA-CathB6, and does not form puncta with Acd28.9-mCherry and HA-CathB6. Figure S5. M. persicae CathB6 locates to mobile puncta within plant cells. FigureS5_A-C.lif Fig.S5A: Confocal images of GFP or CathB6-GFP in N. benthamiana cells. CathB6-GFP forms distinct puncta that are not seen with free GFP. Fig.S5B: CathB6-GFP puncta position adjacently to, but not inside, plant cell nuclei. Fig.S5C (top): Confocal image of CathB6-GFP puncta. Nuclei are stained with 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI). FigureS5C_statistics_Repeat1.lif FigureS5C_statistics_Repeat2.lif FigureS5C_statistics_Repeat3.lif Fig.S5C (Bottom): Classification of CathB6-GFP puncta into three size categories: Large (L), Medium (M), and Small (S) based on area. Puncta frequency was determined as the ratio of cells with CathB6-GFP puncta to the total number of cells observed in the field. Data were compiled from 61 observation fields across three independent experiments, with 22–40 cells per field. Fig. S7. Localizations of CathB6-induced puncta relative to plant cell nuclei. FigureS7.lif Fig.S7A: Visualisation of DAPI-stained nuclei in the presence of CathB6-GFP alone. Fig.S7B: Visualisation of DAPI-stained nuclei in the presence of CathB6-GFP and mCherry. Fig.S7C: Visualisation of DAPI-stained nuclei in the presence of CathB6-GFP and EDS1-mCherry. Fig.S7D: Visualisation of DAPI-stained nuclei in the presence of EDS1-GFP and PAD4-mCherry. Fig.S7E: Visualisation of DAPI-stained nuclei in the presence of GFP and Acd28.9-mCherry. Fig. S8. M. persicae CathB6 and CathB3, and to a lesser extent CathB9, form cytoplasmic puncta in N. benthamiana epidermal cells and A. thaliana protoplasts. FigureS8.lif Fig.S8A: CathB6 forms puncta in N. benthamiana cells when fused to GFP (CathB6-GFP) or RFP (CathB6-RFP), with free RFP or GFP as internal references. Fig.S8B: CathB3-GFP forms puncta of varying sizes in N. benthamiana cells, whereas CathB9-GFP generates significantly fewer puncta. Fig.S8C: CathB6-GFP forms puncta of varying sizes in A. thaliana protoplasts. Fig. S9. CathB6-GFP colocalizes with p-body markers VCS, DCP5 and DCP1 in plant cells. FigureS9.lif Fig.S9A (left): CathB6-GFP colocalizes with VCS-mCherry in N. benthamiana cells. Fig.S9B (left): CathB6-GFP colocalizes with DCP5-mCherry in N. benthamiana cells. Fig.S9C (left): CathB6-GFP colocalizes with DCP1-RFP in N. benthamiana cells. Fig.S9D: Confocal images of YFP-DCP1 and VCS-mCherry in N. benthamiana cells, showing YFP-DCP1 localizing within VCS-mCherry puncta. FigureS9A_statistics_3Repeats.lif Fig.S9A (Right): Quantification of colocalization from three independent experiments across all observation fields. Top: ratios of cells expressing CathB6-GFP and VCS-mCherry. Middle: proportions of cells with large, medium, and small CathB6-GFP puncta colocalized with VCS-mCherry. Bottom: Proportions of VCS-mCherry puncta colocalized with CathB6-GFP in cells with CathB6-GFP. FigureS9B_statistics_3Repeats.lif Fig.S9B (Right): Quantification of colocalization from three independent experiments across all observation fields. Top: ratios of cells expressing CathB6-GFP and DCP5-mCherry. Middle: proportions of cells with large, medium, and small CathB6-GFP puncta colocalized with DCP5-mCherry. Bottom: Proportions of DCP5-mCherry puncta colocalized with CathB6-GFP in cells with CathB6-GFP. FigureS9C_statistics_3Repeats.lif Fig.S9C (Right): Quantification of colocalization from three independent experiments across all observation fields. Top: ratios of cells expressing CathB6-GFP and DCP1-RFP. Middle: proportions of cells with large, medium, and small CathB6-GFP puncta colocalized with DCP1-RFP. Bottom: Proportions of DCP1-RFP puncta colocalized with CathB6-GFP in cells with CathB6-GFP. Figure S10. CathB6-RFP colocalizes with p-body markers YFP-VCS and YFP-DCP1 in N. benthamianaleaf cells and A. thaliana protoplasts. FigureS10.lif Fig.S10A: CathB6-RFP colocalizing with p-body markers YFP-VCS and YFP-DCP1 in N. benthamiana leaf cells. Fig. S10B: CathB6-RFP colocalizing with p-body markers YFP-VCS and YFP-DCP1 in A. thalianaprotoplasts. Figure S11. CathB6-GFP puncta partially colocalize with the stress granule marker RBP47b-mCherry, while no obvious colocalizations were observed with RFP-ATG8 or NPR1-mCherry in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. FigureS11.lif Fig.S11A: CathB6-GFP puncta partially colocalize with the stress granule marker RBP47b-mCherry. Fig.S11B: CathB6-GFP puncta don’t colocalize with RFP-ATG8. Fig.S11C: CathB6-GFP puncta don’t colocalize with NPR1-mCherry. Figure S15. CathB6 relocates EDS1 to puncta in N. benthamiana epidermal cells and A. thalianaprotoplasts. FigureS15.lif Fig.S15A: CathB6-RFP relocates EDS1-GFP to puncta in N. benthamiana epidermal cells Fig.S15B: CathB6-GFP relocates EDS1-mCherry to puncta in A. thaliana protoplasts. Fig. S16. M. persicae CathB6 relocalizes EDS1 alone to cytoplasmic puncta/p-bodies, unlike the EDS1-SAG101 complex that remains localized to nuclei. FigureS16.lif Fig.S16A: M. persicae CathB6 relocalizes EDS1 alone to cytoplasmic puncta/p-bodies in N. benthamianaleaves. Fig.S16B: EDS1-SAG101 complex remains localized to nuclei in the presence of M. persicae CathB6 in N. benthamiana leaves. Fig. S17. Three-partite subcellular analysis shows that CathB6 relocates EDS1 to p-bodies in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. FigureS17.lif Fig.S17A: CathB6-BFP relocates EDS1-GFP to the position of VCS-mCherry. Fig.S17B: CathB6-GFP relocates EDS1-GFP to the puncta labelled by VCS-BFP. Fig. S18. CathB3, CathB6 and CathB6C114D-GFP relocate EDS1-GFP to puncta in N. benthamianaepidermal cells. FigureS18.lif Confocal images of N. benthamiana epidermal cells coexpressing GFP, CathB3-GFP, CathB6-GFP or CathB6C114D-GFP, and EDS1-mCherry. Fig. S24. The C-terminus of CathB6 is required for Acd28.9-mediated relocalization of EDS1 from p-bodies into the cytoplasm and cytoplasmic location of Acd28.9 in the presence of CathB6. FigureS24.lif Fig.S24A: Localization of CathB6∆266-333-GFP and colocalization of CathB6∆266-333-GFP and EDS1-mCherry in puncta. Fig.S24B: EDS1-GFP locates in the cytoplasm in the presence of full-length HA-CathB6 and Acd28.9-mCherry, whereas both EDS1-mCherry and EDS1-GFP locate in puncta in the presence of HA-CathB6∆266-333. Time-lapse recording using confocal microscopy Time-lapse analysis was performed by transient expression of GFP-tagged CathB in N. benthamianaepidermal cells followed by observation with a Leica Stellaris 8 FALCON upright confocal microscope. Please refer to Liu et al. (2024) for full methods. Movie S1. M. persicae CathB6 locates to mobile puncta within cells of N. benthamiana leaves. MovieS1.lif MovieS1: Time-lapse recording of CathB6-GFP in N. benthamiana leaves. Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) CathB6-GFP was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. CathB6-GFP punctum was photobleached with laser, and the recovery was recorded post-bleaching with a Leica Stellaris 8 FALCON upright confocal microscope. Please refer to Liu et al. (2024) for full methods. Fig. S5. M. persicae CathB6 locates to mobile puncta within plant cells. FigureS5D.lif Fig.S5D: Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis of CathB6-GFP puncta. Three representative FRAP images show fluorescence recovery over time, with Time 0 marking the photobleaching pulse. FigureS5E.lif Fig.S5E: Time-course plot of fluorescence recovery for CathB6-GFP puncta after photobleaching. Recovery was quantified as the percentage of fluorescence intensity post-bleaching relative to pre-bleaching intensity. Data are analyzed from 25 independent experiments. FLIM-FRET analysis Constructs for genes of interest were co-expressed in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. Leaf sections were examined using a Leica Stellaris 8 FALCON scanning confocal microscope. FLIM experiments were conducted in TCSPC (Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting) mode. FLIM data were recorded using Leica LAS X software. FRET efficiency was calculated as 1 – (τₓ / τ₀). Please refer to Liu et al. (2024) for full methods. Figure 5. Acd28.9 counteracts CathB6 recruitment of EDS1 to p-bodies and contributes to plant resistance against aphids. Figure5D.lif Fig.5D: FLIM-FRET analysis showing reduced fluorescence lifetime of CathB6-GFP with EDS1 and Acd28.9, but not mCherry and VCS, with CathB6-GFP fluorescence and FLIM images. Figure5_E-F.lif Fig.5E: Lifetime measurements of CathB6-GFP of FLIM in Fig.5D. Fig.5F: Statistical lifetime and FRET efficiency of all FLIM. Acknowledgements We are grateful to JIC Bioimaging Facility for all confocal microscopy included in this submission. This work was funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grants to SAH (BB/V008544/1 and BB/R009481/1) with help from The Gatsby Charitable Foundation, The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich, UK. Additional Support is provided by the BBSRC Institute Strategy Programmes (BBS/E/J/000PR9797 and BBS/E/JI/230001B) awarded to the JIC. The JIC is grant-aided by the John Innes Foundation. Files included: Figure2_A-D.lif Figure2_E-F.lif Figure3_C-F.lif Figure5_B-C.lif Figure5D.lif Figure5_E-F.lif FigureS5_A-C.lif FigureS5C_statistics_Repeat1.lif FigureS5C_statistics_Repeat2.lif FigureS5C_statistics_Repeat3.lif FigureS5D.lif FigureS5E.lif FigureS7.lif FigureS8.lif FigureS9.lif FigureS9A_statistics_3Repeats.lif FigureS9B_statistics_3Repeats.lif FigureS9C_statistics_3Repeats.lif FigureS10.lif FigureS11.lif FigureS15.lif FigureS16.lif FigureS17.lif FigureS18.lif FigureS24.lif MovieS1.lif