InQuartik-PATENT LANDSCAPE: Summary of Assignee's Patent and Technology Deployment

How do you view research and development (RD)? Expenses or investments? In an income statement, it is always viewed as expenses — including activities, equipment, and personnel expenses, lacking additional objective data to review the company's RD output as creating the company's competitive positioning — in comparison with its peers — from the company's patent application behavior. The Patent Landscape Analysis provides the overall summary of technology and patent deployment in multi-languages, answering questions regarding the company's • Technology focus • RD and patent application activities • Peer comparison by key technology • Key inventors How do we do that? We include decades’ worth of global full-text databases, such as the US, China, EM/EUIPO, Japan, Korea, WIPO and so on, and keep them updated on a timely basis—as frequently as every day or week, depending on the sources. Furthermore, the data downloaded are cleansed to minimize data errors and thus search and analysis errors. For example, we standardize assignee names to enables individual patents to correspond to a single owner; logic-based corrections ensure that values are corrected based on rules. In addition, we use advanced algorithms in analyzing, selecting, and presenting the most current and accurate information from multiple available data sources. For instance, a single patent’s legal status is triangulated across different patent data for accuracy. Moreover, proprietary Quality and Value rankings put patents that are applied in the same Patent Trademark Office under equally evaluative criteria, offering subjective predictions for the patent's likelihood of validity and monetization.