Suppl table S2 | Eyeblink conditioning outcome measures and statistics for tg interictal vs. tg ictal vs. wild-types

Suppl table S2 | Eyeblink conditioning outcome measures and statistics for tg interictal vs. tg ictal vs. wild-types. The mean CR percentage (±95% CI), the CR FEC (±95% CI), the latency to CR onset (±95% CI), the latency to CR peak (±95% CI), the percentage of perfect latency to CR peak (±95% CI), and the SD of the latency to CR peak (±95% CI) of all daily sessions in all groups (tg ictal and interictal, and wild-type) are shown. An ANOVA on LME was done on group, session and group*session. The session outcomes (at bottom) were corrected using the Bonferroni-Holm correction. (N/A, Not Applicable)<br>补充表S2 | 转基因（tg）发作间期组、tg发作期组与野生型组的眨眼条件反射结局指标及统计分析结果。本表格展示了所有组别（tg发作期组、tg发作间期组及野生型组）全部日常训练会话的下述指标：平均条件反射（Conditioned Response, CR）百分比（±95%置信区间（Confidence Interval, CI））、CR FEC（±95% CI）、条件反射出现潜伏期（±95% CI）、条件反射峰值潜伏期（±95% CI）、完美条件反射峰值潜伏期占比（±95% CI），以及条件反射峰值潜伏期的标准差（Standard Deviation, SD，±95% CI）。本研究针对组别、会话及组别×会话的交互效应，采用线性混合效应模型（Linear Mixed Effects, LME）进行方差分析（Analysis of Variance, ANOVA）。会话层面的结局指标（位于表格底部）采用Bonferroni-Holm校正法进行多重比较校正。（N/A，不适用）