Open Peer Review on Qeios - "Supersymmetry Via EDM (Electric Dipole Moment)"

PRELIMINARY NOTE #1 - My approach may be called quantum-gravitational. I take "educated guesses", using the present state of scientific knowledge, at what might be revealed by a future union of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Educated guesses sound remote from real science, but it's the best that can be done with a theory which doesn't exist yet. Of course, the maths accompanying that theory doesn't exist either - so formal mathematics can't be used. The quantum-gravitational approach isn't meant to be purely mathematical but also physical, with the binary digits and Mobius strips that compose every fermion and boson being linked - a state at odds with our human frame of reference of seeing objects and events as separated. As the movie "Interstellar" pointed out, people will oneday be able to build things they can't build now. Let's scientifically explore a few of those things. (Thanks go to Penny from TV's "Big Bang Theory" for inspiring Interstellar-related thoughts!) At the start of the 20th century, physicist Max Planck assumed that electromagnetic radiation can only be emitted or absorbed in discrete packets, called quanta. He thought of his discovery as nothing more than a math device ... a kind of trickery. Albert Einstein developed his explanation of the photoelectric effect from this "mathematical convenience". So it appears entirely possible that another supposed mathematical trickery (Wick rotation) will find practical application in the future. Imagine the universe actually is a holographic projection or a computer simulation where every fermion and boson is linked by the AI-generating BITS (binary digits) of 1 and 0. What happens to formal mathematical definitions when every fermion and boson is linked? The linkage means everything throughout time and space can be regarded as one particle. This is reminiscent of John Wheeler's and Richard Feynman's speculation that the entire universe consists of just one electron, zigzagging through time (the weirdness of quantum physics vanishes and no particle can exist in two places at once since the unification of everything in space and time - possibly achieved with Quantum Gravity - means only one place or event can ever exist in the universal, co-moving frame of reference where observer and observed are united). If the universe can be regarded as one particle, how can one thing be added to another thing? Then 1+1=2 cannot be true in an absolute or quantum-gravity sense. 1+1=2 would only be true in the human frame of reference (it would also be true in the technology and mathematics which the human frame of reference developed). These conclusions regarding 1+1=2 may be compatible not only with a QG (quantum-gravitational) approach but also with an LF (Leonardo-Faraday) one. Neither Leonardo da Vinci nor Michael Faraday appear to have trained in the formal mathematics of their time but that lack never stopped them from discovering great things.初步说明#1：本研究路径可被归类为量子引力方法。笔者基于当前的科学认知，针对广义相对论（General Relativity）与量子力学（Quantum Mechanics）未来融合后可能揭示的内容作出“有依据的推测”。尽管有依据的推测看似与真正的科学相去甚远，但在尚未成型的理论框架下，这已是所能采取的最优方式。当然，该理论配套的数学工具也尚未问世，因此无法使用形式化数学进行推导。量子引力方法并非仅局限于数学层面，同时兼具物理内涵：构成所有费米子（fermion）与玻色子（boson）的二进制数位与莫比乌斯带（Mobius strips）彼此关联——这种状态与人类将物体与事件视为相互分离的认知框架相悖。正如电影《星际穿越》（Interstellar）所揭示的那样，人类终将能够制造出当下无法实现的事物。让我们以科学的方式探索其中的若干方向。（感谢美剧《生活大爆炸》（Big Bang Theory）中的佩妮（Penny）为笔者带来与星际穿越相关的灵感！） 20世纪初，物理学家马克斯·普朗克（Max Planck）提出，电磁辐射只能以离散的能量包形式发射或吸收，这种能量包被称为量子（quanta）。他曾认为自己的发现不过是一种数学工具……某种“数学花招”。阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦（Albert Einstein）正是基于这一“数学便利”，提出了光电效应的解释。因此，另一项被视为数学花招的理论——维克旋转（Wick rotation）——未来完全有可能获得实际应用。 不妨设想，宇宙实则为一场全息投影（holographic projection）或计算机模拟（computer simulation），其中所有费米子与玻色子均由生成人工智能的二进制数位（binary digits，即0与1）彼此关联。当所有费米子与玻色子彼此关联时，形式化数学的定义将发生何种变化？这种关联意味着，时空内的一切事物均可被视为单一粒子。这不禁让人联想到约翰·惠勒（John Wheeler）与理查德·费曼（Richard Feynman）的推测：整个宇宙仅由一个电子构成，该电子在时间中往复穿梭。（量子物理的诡异特性将因此消失，粒子无法同时存在于两个位置——因为时空万物的统一（或许可通过量子引力（Quantum Gravity）实现）意味着，在观察者与被观察者融为一体的宇宙共动参考系中，仅存在唯一的位置或事件。） 倘若宇宙可被视为单一粒子，那么如何实现“一物与另一物相加”？那么，1+1=2在绝对意义或量子引力视角下便不再成立。1+1=2仅在人类的认知框架内成立（该等式在人类认知框架下发展出的技术与数学体系中同样成立）。这些关于1+1=2的结论，不仅可与量子引力（quantum-gravitational，简称QG）路径兼容，亦可适配莱昂纳多-法拉第（Leonardo-Faraday，简称LF）路径。莱昂纳多·达·芬奇与迈克尔·法拉第（Michael Faraday）似乎均未学习过其所处时代的形式化数学，但这种短板从未阻碍他们取得重大发现。