Table 2 in Pezothrips kellyanus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) nymphs on orange fruit: importance of the second generation for its management

Table 2. Occupancy and insecticide efficacy (when occupancy was significantly different from the control) of fruits by Pezothrips kellyanus in 2 orchards located in Alzira and Tavernes.
Day −1Day 2Day 7Day 14Day 21Day 28OrchardTreatments% occupancy% occupancy% efficacy% occupancy% efficacy% occupancy% occupancy% occupancyAlziraControl20.00 ± 1.5019.72 ± 2.45 a1.61 ± 0.56 a2.22 ± 0.902.40 ± 0.331.61 ± 0.56Chlorpyrifos22.25 ± 1.770.75 ± 0.38 c96.20 ± 1.90 a1.70 ± 0.39 a2.75 ± 0.952.26 ± 0.361.70 ± 0.39Spinosad18.13 ± 2.250.0 ± 0.0 c98.42 ± 1.58 a1.62 ± 0.34 a0.31 ± 0.311.54 ± 0.261.62 ± 0.34Spirotetramat20.63 ± 1.759.06 ± 1.70 b54.05 ± 8.60 b1.41 ± 0.31 a1.56 ± 0.661.67 ± 0.321.41 ± 0.31F 3,34 = 0.88 P = 3.34F 3,34 = 38.12 P <0.001F 2,25 = 27.39 P <0.001F 3,34 = 0.09 P = 0.96F 3,34 = 1.79 P = 0.17F 3,34 = 1.76 P = 0.21F 3,34 = 0.09 P = 0.96TavernesControl15.00 ± 1.1510.16 ± 0.53 a2.44 ± 0.67 a2.03 ± 0.705.46 ± 1.476.09 ± 0.82Chlorpyrifos13.44 ± 1.810.55 ± 0.15 b94.62 ± 1.470.63 ± 0.13 b74.19 ± 5.171.09 ± 0.535.46 ± 1.138.59 ± 0.86Spinosad14.53 ± 3.041.02 ± 0.45 b90.00 ± 4.420.40 ± 0.24 b83.26 ± 9.880.96 ± 0.455.49 ± 1.487.69 ± 1.42Spirotetramat14.90 ± 0.778.38 ± 3.00 a1.64 ± 0.34 ab1.44 ± 1.037.53 ± 3.025.61 ± 1.65F 3,15 = 0.14 P = 0.94F 3,15 =10.15 P = 0.001F 1,7 = 0.18 P = 0.68F 3,15 = 5.51 P = 0.01F 1,7 = 1.40 P = 0.28F 3,15 = 0.43 P = 0.73F 3,15 = 0.25 P = 0.86F 3,15 = 1.11 P = 0.38
Data presented are mean % ± SE. Means followed by different lowercase letters within a column and location are significantly different (1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests, P <0.05).