State Election in Schleswig-Holstein 2017

Assessment of parties and politicians. Attitude towards political issues.

Topics: eligibility to vote in the state election in Schleswig-Holstein; most important political issues in Schleswig-Holstein; intention to participate in the state elections; intended voting type (polling station or postal vote); party preference (first vote and second vote); certainty of pesonal voting decision; importance of federal politics for the personal voting decision at state level; interest in the state election; voting behaviour in the last state election; coalition preference; attitude towards a government of SPD, Grünen and SSW, of SPD, Grünen and FDP, of CDU, Grünen and FDP, Split A: from SPD, Grünen and Die Linke, from CDU and SPD under leadership of CDU, from SPD and CDU under leadership of SPD (end of split A), split A: from CDU and Grünen, from CDU and FDP as well as from SPD and Grünen (end of split B); sympathy scale for selected parties at federal and state level; satisfaction with the state government of SPD, Grünen and SSW, the individual parties SPD, Grüne and SSW in the state government, the parties CDU, FDP and Piratenpartei in the opposition in the state parliament and the federal government of CDU/CSU and SPD (Skalometer); knowledge of the top candidates of the SPD and CDU for the office of Prime Minister; sympathy scale for selected top politicians (Torsten Albig, Daniel Günther, Monika Heinold, Wolfgang Kubicki, Angela Merkel and Martin Schulz); party that pleases best and second best; political interest; preference for Torsten Albig or Daniel Günther as prime minister; split A: comparison of the credibility, sympathy and expertise of the two leading politicians Torsten Albig and Daniel Günther (end of Split A); assessment of the economic situation of the federal state in general and in comparison with the other western German federal states; economic expectations for Schleswig-Holstein; assessment of the personal economic situation at present and in one year; split B: most competent party to solve the economic problems in the federal state, in the areas of job creation, social justice, school policy and education policy, transport policy and energy policy (end of split B); Schleswig-Holstein can cope with many refugees; party that best represents a policy in the personal sense concerning refugees; opinion on the sustainability of the federal state; most competent party to solve future problems of the federal state; assessment of the work of Prime Minister Torsten Albig; election intention of the SPD in the state election only because of Martin Schulz; vote for AfD on the basis of political demands of AfD or as a lesson for the other parties; intention to vote AfD in the state election on the basis of political demands of AfD or as a lesson for the other parties; sufficient separation of AfD in Schleswig-Holstein from right-wing extremist contents and members; opinion on selected statements on politics in Schleswig-Holstein (disagreement of the party leadership of the AfD in the federal government as reason for possibly poor performance of the AfD in Schleswig-Holstein, the Greens in Schleswig-Holstein stand for a different policy than the Greens in the federal government); split A: supporting the return to 9 years of schooling at secondary schools; opinion on more wind turbines in Schleswig-Holstein; expected winner of the state election in Schleswig-Holstein (end of split A); fair share of living standards.

Demography: sex; age (classified); marital status; cohabitation with a partner; highest school leaving certificate or desired school leaving certificate; university degree; completed vocational training; occupation; assessment of own job security; occupational status; household size; number of persons aged 18 and over in the household; trade union member in the household; denomination; frequency of church attendance; party affiliation; party identification; number of telephone numbers in the household; city size.

Additionally coded was: questionnaire number; weighting factor.

Various questions were asked only half of the respondents. A forked questionnaire was used.

政党与政治人物评价、政治议题立场调研。
调研主题涵盖：石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州（Schleswig-Holstein）州选投票资格；石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州当前最核心的政治议题；州选投票意向；拟采用的投票方式（投票站投票或邮寄投票）；政党偏好（第一选票与第二选票）；个人投票决策的确定性；联邦层面政治对个人州选投票决策的重要性；对州选的关注程度；上一次州选的投票行为；联合执政偏好；对多组联合执政方案的态度：包括社民党（SPD）、绿党（Grüne）与南石勒苏益格选民联盟（SSW）；社民党、绿党与自由民主党（FDP）；基民盟（CDU）、绿党与自由民主党；拆分组A：社民党、绿党与左翼党（Die Linke）；基民盟与社民党（由基民盟牵头）；社民党与基民盟（由社民党牵头，拆分组A结束）；拆分组A：基民盟与绿党；基民盟与自由民主党，以及社民党与绿党（拆分组B结束）；联邦与州层面选定政党的好感度评分；基于斯卡勒量表（Skalometer）的满意度评价：包括社民党、绿党与南石勒苏益格选民联盟组成的州政府；州政府内的各政党（社民党、绿党与南石勒苏益格选民联盟）；州议会反对阵营中的基民盟、自由民主党与海盗党（Piratenpartei）；基民盟/基社盟（CDU/CSU）与社民党组成的联邦政府；对社民党与基民盟两党角逐州总理职位的顶级候选人的认知度；选定顶级政治人物的好感度评分：包括托尔斯滕·阿尔比希（Torsten Albig）、丹尼尔·京特（Daniel Günther）、莫妮卡·海诺尔德（Monika Heinold）、沃尔夫冈·库比基（Wolfgang Kubicki）、安格拉·默克尔（Angela Merkel）与马丁·舒尔茨（Martin Schulz）；最受喜爱与第二受喜爱的政党；政治兴趣程度；托尔斯滕·阿尔比希与丹尼尔·京特两人中更偏好担任州总理的人选；拆分组A：对比两位顶级候选人托尔斯滕·阿尔比希与丹尼尔·京特的可信度、好感度与专业能力（拆分组A结束）；对石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州整体经济状况的评价，以及与其他西德联邦州的对比；石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州的经济前景预期；对当前及未来一年个人经济状况的评价；拆分组B：在本州经济问题解决、就业创造、社会公平、学校与教育政策、交通政策与能源政策领域最具胜任力的政党（拆分组B结束）；石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州能否接纳大量难民；从个人立场出发，最能代表自身难民政策主张的政党；对本州可持续发展的看法；最有能力解决本州未来各类问题的政党；对时任州总理托尔斯滕·阿尔比希履职表现的评价；仅因马丁·舒尔茨的缘故而计划将选票投给社民党的州选投票意向；基于德国选择党（AfD）的政治诉求，或作为对其他政党的惩戒性投票而选择德国选择党的情况；基于德国选择党的政治诉求，或作为对其他政党的惩戒性投票而计划在州选中投票给德国选择党的意向；石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州的德国选择党是否已与右翼极端主义内容及成员划清界限；对石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州政治相关表述的看法：包括“联邦层面德国选择党领导层的分歧是其在石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州表现不佳的原因”、“石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州绿党与联邦层面绿党奉行不同的政策”；拆分组A：支持恢复中学9年制教育；对石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州增设风力发电机组的看法；石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州州选的预期获胜者（拆分组A结束）；生活水平的公平分配。

人口统计维度涵盖：性别、年龄分组、婚姻状况、伴侣同居情况、最高学历/预期最高学历、大学学位、完成的职业培训、职业、个人工作安全感评价、职业身份、家庭规模、家庭中18岁及以上人口数量、家庭工会成员情况、宗教信仰、教堂礼拜频率、党派隶属、政党认同、家庭电话号码数量、城市规模。

额外编码项包括：问卷编号、加权因子。

本调研仅向半数受访者提出部分问题，采用了分叉式问卷设计。