Additional file 2 of An in-depth evaluation of metagenomic classifiers for soil microbiomes

Additional file 2. Table S1: The R packages, version and tools utilised in this study. Table S2: Comparative mpact of tools and abundance thresholds on F1 Measure: Results from the Dunn Test. Key outcomes from the post-hoc Dunn test underscore the impact of various tools and relative abundance threshold on the F1 measure. Here, Z values represent the standard Z scores, and any p-value below 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. Table S3a: Kruskal-Wallis analysis examining the influence of tools and thresholds on Euclidean distance per sample. Data was grouped by 'Run' and 'Classifier'. Each row indicates differences in Euclidean distance for specific groupings. The H-values, derived from the Kruskal-Wallis test statistic, consistently indicate significant differences between groups. Effect sizes are denoted by the eta2[H] values, which fall within an approximate range of 0.902 to 0.950. All associated p-values are less than 0.0001. Table S3b: Significant findings from the post-hoc Dunn test: This table highlights the effects of different tools and threshold values on the Euclidean distance, calculated for each sample in every run. Table S4: Chi-squared Analysis of Classification Outcomes by Different Tools at Family Level, Showing All Outcomes (FN, FP, TN, TP) with Significant P-values.