Replication Data for: Transparency, Class Bias, and Redistribution: Evidence From the American States

This study employs state-level panel data between 1978-2000 to explore the relationship between transparency, media market penetration, class bias in voter participation, and welfare effort in the United States. I present empirical evidence that the effect of transparency - operationalized as state fiscal transparency - on state welfare effort is conditional on class bias in voter participation. Specifically, I present evidence that in states where transparency and class bias increased over time, state welfare effort significantly declined. These results are robust to the inclusion of controls for other determinants of redistribution that traditionally vary with geography such as governor partisanship, legislator ideology, citizen ideology, gross state product (GSP), and state demographic characteristics and are robust across several alternate model specifications. My findings suggest that increased transparency does not automatically improve the condition of socio-economically disadvantaged citizens and that transparency may have welfare-reducing effects in societies with increasing participatory gulfs between the most and least advantaged citizens.