Dataset: High-performance chiral mirrors by twisted anisotropic photonic crystals

Fig. 2b: Dependence of the optical torque density (in eV/cm^3, second column) over the LP angle (in radiants, first column), exerted by the medium on the EM field, upon refraction by the medium in z=0. c Fig. 2c: Dependence of the optical chirality (in mN/m^3, second to sixth column) over the propagation coordinate z (in mum, first column) for distinct impinging LP angles Χ=0 (second column),π/6 (third column),π/4 (fourth column),π/3 (fifth column),π/2 (sixth column). Fig. 2dFW: Dependence of the forward EM fields' Stokes parameters (in V^2/m^2, second to fifth column) on z (in mum, first column) for Χ=π/4. Fig. 2dBW: Dependence of the backward EM fields' Stokes parameters (second to fifth column) on z (in mum, first column) for Χ=π/4. Fig. 2e: Dependence of the optical torque volume density (in eV/cm^3, from secont to sifth column) on z (in mum, first column) for several distinct impinging LP angles Χ=0 (second column),π/6 (third column),π/4 (fourth column),π/3 (fifth column),π/2 (sixth column). Fig. 2e: Dependence of the optical torque volume density (in eV/cm^3, from secont to sifth column) on z (in mum, first column) for several distinct impinging LP angles Χ=0 (second column),π/6 (third column),π/4 (fourth column),π/3 (fifth column),π/2 (sixth column). Fig. 2f: Dependence of the optical torque surface density (in eV/m^2, from secont to sifth column) on z (in mum, first column) for several distinct impinging LP angles Χ=0 (second column),π/6 (third column),π/4 (fourth column),π/3 (fifth column),π/2 (sixth column). Fig. 3a: Dependence of the optical torque density (in eV/cm^3, second (RCP) and third (LCP) columns) over the propagation distance z (in nm, first column). Fig. 3b: Dependence of the effective optical torque per unit surface (in meV/m^2, second (RCP) and third (LCP) columns) over the propagation distance z (in nm, first column). Fig. 3c: Dependence of the optical chirality (in mN/m^3, second (RCP) and third (LCP) columns) over the propagation distance z (in nm, first column). Fig. 4a: Dependence on the number of multilayers (first column) of the optical torque density (in eV/cm^3, second (RCP) and third (LCP) columns) for both normally incident RCP and LCP light. Fig. 4b: Dependence on the number of multilayers (first column) of the optical torque per unit surface (in meV/m^2, second (RCP) and third (LCP) columns) for both normally incident RCP and LCP light. Fig. 4cL: Wavelength (in nm, first column) dependence of the length average of the optical torque density (in eV/cm^3, second column) for normally incident LCP light. Fig. 4cR: Wavelength (in nm, first column) dependence of the length average of the optical torque density (in eV/cm^3, second column) for normally incident RCP light. Fig. 4d: Wavelength (in nm, first column) dependence of the reflectance (second column) and transmittance (third column) of LCP light with normally incident LCP light. Fig. 4e: Wavelength (in nm, first column) dependence of the reflectance (second column) and transmittance (third column) of RCP light with normally incident RCP light. Fig. 4f: Dependence on the number of multilayers (first column) of the optical chirality (in mN/m^3, second (RCP) and third (LCP) columns) for both normally incident RCP and LCP light. Fig. 5b: Dependence of LCP reflectance (third column) upon LCP excitation at λ = 500 nm over the angles of incidence θ (in degrees, first column) and φ (in degrees, second column). Fig. 5c: Dependence of RCP transmittance (third column) upon RCP excitation at λ = 500 nm over the angles of incidence θ (in degrees, first column) and φ (in degrees, second column). Fig. 6a: Wavelength (in nm, first column) dependence of averaged LCP reflectance (second column) and transmittance (third column) upon LCP excitation, and optimal LCP reflectance (fourth column) and transmittance (fifth column) upon LCP excitation. Fig. 6b: Wavelength (in nm, first column) dependence of averaged RCP reflectance (second column) and transmittance (third column) upon RCP excitation, and optimal RCP reflectance (fourth column) and transmittance (fifth column) upon RCP excitation. Fig. 6c: Wavelength (in nm, first column) dependence of averaged LCP reflectance (second column) and transmittance (third column) standard deviations upon LCP excitation. Fig. 6d: Wavelength (in nm, first column) dependence of averaged RCP reflectance (second column) and transmittance (third column) standard deviations upon RCP excitation.