Table 1. Phvlogenetic ANOVA P in Tinking small: miniaturization might have facilitated adaptation to new niches in tarantulas

Table 1. Phvlogenetic ANOVA P -values, multivariate analvsis results, and the phvlogenetic signals estimated for the traits.
TraitNp(Microhabitat)Post hoc1.Bodv Size (BS)730.006 *H1–H2 (P =.99) H1–H3 (P =.042) * H2–H3 (P =.012) *2.Carapace Shape (CS)860.3243.Eve Size (ES)530.3774.Anterior Lateral Eve enlargement (ALEe)530.6545.Anterior to Posterior Eves Ratio (APE)530.3896.Relative Leg Length (RLL)850.3647.Frontleg Difference (FLD)760.5188.Tibia Elongation (TiL)850.4179.Frontleg Elongation (FLE)840.041 *H1–H2 (P =.186) H1–H3 (P =.033) * H2–H3 (P =.525)10.Hind Leg Difference (HLD)840.1511.Metatarsus Elongation (MtL)840.36112.Tarsus Elongation (TaL)840.556Multivariate 12 traits520.001 *H1–H2 (P =.003)* H1–H3 (P =.003)* H2–H3 (P =.003)*Multivariate nine traits710.001 *H1–H2 (P =.003) * H1–H3 (P =.003) * H2–H3 (P =.003) *