Measuring photon correlation using imperfect detectors- data

Research data linked to https://arxiv.org/html/2411.12835v1. Accepted for publication in Physical Review Applied. Files labelled according to published article.Figure_1a: Photon statistics for 3 canonical light sources. Column 1 = time. Other columns = probability of second photon detection for the 3 sources, as labelled.Figure_1b: Saturation of a detector with deadtime for 3 canonical light sources. Column 1= Detectable events. Other columns = detections, for the 3 sources, as labelled.Figure_2a: Loss of detector efficiency with detection rate. Column 1 = Detectable events. Other columns = detector efficiency for different sources. Figure_2b: Column 1= Waiting times. Column 2 = Waiting time distribution. Column 3 = efficiency.Figure 2b_insert: Column 1 = Waiting time. Column 2= detections. Figure_2c: Efficiency drop with detection rate. Column 1= Detections. Other columns = detector efficiency for the 3 canonical sources. Figure_3b; Second order correlation versus incident rate. Column 1= Time. Other columns = second order correlation function for the different detected rates, as labelled.Figure_3c: Third order correlation matrix. Row 1 and Column 1 =Time differences. Other cells are the (normalised) 3rd order correlation function.Figure_3d: Column 1= Detections. Column 2 = second order correlation. [2 data files are included, for the experimental data and the result of the simulation model] Figure_3e: Column 1= Detections. Column 2 = third order correlation. [2 data files are included, for the experimental data and the result of the simulation model] Figure_3f: Column 1= Detections. Column 2 = fourth order correlation. [2 data files are included, for the experimental data and the result of the simulation model] Figure 4a: Simulation of number of detectors (column 1) versus second order correlation function (other columns) for 3 incident rates, as labelled.Figure 4b: Simulation of number of detectors (column 1) versus coincidence rate (other columns) for 3 incident rates, as labelled.Figure_6a: Second order correlation from the Martiensen lamp. Column 1 = time, Column 2 = second order correlation. Same data is shown in Figure_6b at a smaller time range.Figure_6c: Magnitude of the second order correlation as the lens focal position is changed. Column 1 = focal position in mm. Column 2 = magnitude of second order correlation function.

本研究数据与https://arxiv.org/html/2411.12835v1相链接。已获《物理评论应用》期刊接受发表。文件标签遵循已发表文章的规范。图1a：三种典型光源的光子统计。列1 = 时间。其余列 = 第二个光子被检测到的概率，分别对应于三个光源，如标签所示。图1b：三种典型光源的探测器饱和度与死区时间。列1 = 可检测事件。其余列 = 对三个光源的检测，如标签所示。图2a：探测器效率随检测率下降。列1 = 可检测事件。其余列 = 不同光源的探测器效率。图2b：列1 = 等待时间。列2 = 等待时间分布。列3 = 效率。图2b_insert：列1 = 等待时间。列2 = 检测。图2c：检测率下效率下降。列1 = 检测。其余列 = 三种典型光源的探测器效率。图3b：二阶相关性与入射率的关系。列1 = 时间。其余列 = 对不同检测率的二阶相关函数，如标签所示。图3c：三阶相关矩阵。行1和列1 = 时间差。其余单元格是（归一化的）三阶相关函数。图3d：列1 = 检测。列2 = 二阶相关性。[包含2个数据文件，用于实验数据和模拟模型的结果] 图3e：列1 = 检测。列2 = 三阶相关性。[包含2个数据文件，用于实验数据和模拟模型的结果] 图3f：列1 = 检测。列2 = 四阶相关性。[包含2个数据文件，用于实验数据和模拟模型的结果] 图4a：模拟不同入射率下探测器数量（列1）与二阶相关函数（其余列）的关系，如标签所示。图4b：模拟不同入射率下探测器数量（列1）与巧合率（其余列）的关系，如标签所示。图6a：Martiensen灯产生的二阶相关性。列1 = 时间。列2 = 二阶相关性。相同数据在图6b的较小时间范围内展示。图6c：当透镜焦距位置变化时，二阶相关性的幅度。列1 = 毫米级的焦距位置。列2 = 二阶相关函数的幅度。