Master chart

Compare the effectiveness of muscle energy technique and kinesiotaping in addition to conventional physiotherapy in patients with mechanical sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
Our research hypothesis was to find out which treatment technique is more effective in above condition. Here, Participants age, height, weight, Body mass index were compared at baseline. Pain pressure threshold (PPT), Hand held dynamometer (HHD) and Modified oswestry disability index (MODI) were taken at baseline and after 2 week and after 4th week of intervention. Total 30 participants recruited according to selection criteria. After analysis we concluded that Muscle energy technique is more effective than kinesiotaping in mechanical sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

本研究旨在对比肌肉能量技术、肌内效贴扎以及传统物理治疗在机械性骶髂关节功能障碍患者中的治疗效果。研究假设旨在探究在上述条件下，哪种治疗技术更为有效。在此，研究者在基线时对参与者的年龄、身高、体重以及体质指数进行了比较。此外，基线时以及干预后的第2周和第4周，分别测量了疼痛压力阈值（PPT）、手持式测力计（HHD）以及改良奥斯维斯特功能障碍指数（MODI）。根据选择标准，共招募了30名参与者。经过分析，我们得出结论：在机械性骶髂关节功能障碍的治疗中，肌肉能量技术相较于肌内效贴扎具有更高的疗效。