Replication data for: Fig 8.14, Bottom, Submergers vs nonsubmergers, BTPDs, 21 Nov 2025

FILE DESCRIPTION Keywords: alarm calls, submergers vs nonsubmergers, BTPDs Filename = Fig 8.14, Bottom, Submergers vs nonsubmergers, BTPDs, 21 Nov 2025 OLD file name = BTPDs, Alarm calls, submergers vs nonsubmergers, 10 April 2019 These data are from BTPDs of my first book (Hoogland, 1995) I assume all data were checked TWO TIMES, because that's what I always did for my first book 598/2255 of BTPD submergers = 26.52% DID give alarm call in response to experimental badger 1657/2255 of BTPD submergers = 73.48% % DID NOT give alarm call in response to experimental badger 688/3299 of BTPD NON-submergers = 20.85% DID give alarm call in response to experimental badgers 2611/3299 of BTPD NON-submergers = 79.15% DID NOT give alarm call in response to experimental badgers The data in this file are group BY YEAR. The summaries I provide immediately above and in figure for my new book are the SUMMATION OF DATA FROM ALL YEARS Variable = Frequency = number of observations of calling or non-calling for closest and not closest prairie dogs Submerger = 1 = prairie dog DID submerge Submerger = 2 = prairie dog did NOT submerge Alarm call = 1 = prairie dog DID give alarm call Alarm call = 2 = prairie dog did NOT give alarm call For statistical analysis, I did a 2x2 chi-square test These data used for Fig 8.14, Bottom, in Hoogland 2026. This file ready for longterm storage on 03 June 2025. I considered data from the same prairie dog in different years to be independent. Counts for this file come from study of alarm call raw data sheets. Filename = Fig 8.14, Bottom, Submergers vs nonsubmergers, BTPDs, 03 June 2025 I considered data from the same prairie dog on the same day and on different days and in different years to be independent.