BAMM at the court of false equivalency: a response to Meyer and Wiens
收藏DataONE2020-06-30 更新2025-06-21 收录
下载链接:
https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256:f8e0dee8b4ab0fa67dca4fd35429c3902e83a15fd61f84dbd98a9867584055c9
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
The software program BAMM has been widely used to study rates of speciation, extinction, and phenotypic evolution on phylogenetic trees. The program implements a model-based clustering algorithm to identify clades that share common macroevolutionary rate dynamics and to estimate parameters. A recent simulation study by Meyer and Wiens (M&W) claimed that (i) a simple inference framework (\"MS\") performs much better than BAMM, and (ii) evolutionary rates inferred with BAMM are poorly correlated with true rates. I address two statistical concerns with their assessment that affect the generality of their conclusions. These considerations are not specific to BAMM and apply to other methods for estimating parameters from empirical data where the true grouping structure of the data is unknown. M&W constrain roughly half of the parameters in their MS analyses to their true values, but BAMM is given no such information and must estimate all parameters from the data. This information dispa...
创建时间:
2025-06-17



