Dataset and Analysis Procedure for Job-Work Fit as a Determinant of the Acceptance of Large-Scale Agile Methodology

The data analysis requires the creation of a structural model, which can be analyzed using SmartPLS 3 as follows: Subjective Norm -> Job_Work Fit, External Support -> Job_Work Fit, Subjective Norm -> Methodology Acceptance, External Support -> Methodology Acceptance, Job_Work Fit -> Methodology Acceptance, Mandatoriness -> Methodology Acceptance, Exp Agile (single item measure) -> Methodology Acceptance, Org Size (single item measure) -> Methodology Acceptance. Job_Work Fit is a second-order reflective construct composed of Perceived Usefulness and Compatibility, and thus, you should have Job_Work Fit -> Perceived Usefulness and Job_Work Fit -> Compatibility. The indicators of Job_Work fit will be the union of those of Perceived Usefulness and Compatibility. Methodology Acceptance (Agile_Val_P). Agile values and principles (Sys_Think). Systems thinking (Lean). Lean product development (Transparency). Transparency (Cont_Improve). Continual improvement (Decent_Decision). Decentralized decision making The constructs subjective norm, perceived usefulness, mandatoriness, external support, and compatibility were measured using the following Likert scale: Strongly disagree (1) Disagree (2) Somewhat disagree (3) Neither agree nor disagree (4) Somewhat agree (5) Agree (6) Strongly agree (7) Subjective Norm To what extent have the following influenced your acceptance of the large-scale agile methodology (LSAM) ? (Peer). Peer groups (Supervisor). Supervisors (Trade_Pub). Trade Publications (Prof_Org). Professional Organizations Perceived Usefulness As compared with alternative methodologies, I perceive that the adopted LSAM provides a distinct improvement in (Soft_Qual). Software quality (Deliv_Time). Delivery Time (Lower_Cust). Lowering costs (Cust_Satisf). Customer satisfaction (Team_Satisf). Team satisfaction Mandatoriness Regarding the adopted large-scale agile methodology (LSAM) mentioned by you: (Compulsory). Using the LSAM is compulsory in my job (Required). Although I might prefer another methodology, I am required to use the LSAM (Explicit_Pol). The company has an explicit policy for using the LSAM (Strong_Pref). The company has a strong preference for standardizing development using the LSAM External Support For helping me to better understand and use the adopted LSAM , the following resources are widely available: (Spec_Inst). Specialized instruction (Coaching). Coaching resource (Net_Support). Network of support (Help_Res). Help and resources Compatibility I feel that using the adopted LSAM is more compatible than other methodologies for (Way_Dev). The way I develop systems (Handle_Large). Handling large projects (Recon_Stake). Reconciling different views of stakeholders (Resp_Change). Responding to changes in requirements