Table A in S1 File: Reads—The number of input, mapped reads, and average mapping for all individuals in each condition.

Table B in S1 File: IEGs—A list of immediate early genes used in hypothesis testing. Table C in S1 File: CORT_DS—Corticosteroid plasma levels and David’s scores pre- and post-reorganization for each individual. Table D in S1 File: Pre_WinLoss—Win Loss behavior data for all cohorts pre-reorganization. Table E in S1 File: Post_WinLoss—Win Loss behavior data for all cohorts post-reorganization. Table F in S1 File: NormalizedCounts—Normalized gene expression for all genes mapped for each sample. Table G in S1 File: DESvsDOM—The gene name, Entrez ID, log fold change, and eFDR p-value for all genes in the descender (DES) vs reorganized dominant (DOM) comparison. Table H in S1 File: DESvsCDOM- The gene name, Entrez ID, log fold change, and eFDR p-value for all genes in the descender (DES) vs control dominant (CDOM) comparison. Table I in S1 File: DOMvsCDOM -The gene name, Entrez ID, log fold change, and eFDR p-value for all genes in the reorganized dominant (DOM) vs control dominant (DOM) comparison. Table J in S1 File: ASCvsSUB—The gene name, Entrez ID, log fold change, and eFDR p-value for all genes in the ascender (ASC) vs reorganized subordinate (SUB) comparison.Table K in S1 File: ASCvsCSUB—The gene name, Entrez ID, log fold change, and eFDR p-value for all genes in the ascender (ASC) vs control subordinate (CSUB) comparison. Table L in S1 File: SUBvsCSUB—The gene name, Entrez ID, log fold change, and eFDR p-value for all genes in the reorganized subordinate (SUB) vs control subordinate (CSUB) comparison. Table M in S1 File: DEGs_GO-Terms—All relevant statistics for GO-terms from the GO-enrichment analysis ran on DEGs from the following comparisons DES vs. DOM, DES vs. CDOM, DOM vs. CDOM, ASC vs. SUB, ASC vs. CSUB, and SUB vs. CSUB. GO-Terms can be found in S8 and S9 Figs. Table N in S1 File: TRN_genes—Summary of transition genes showing significant fold changes in transitioning vs reorganized animals. Log fold change and eFDR values for each gene for each comparison provided. Table O in S1 File: TRN_GO-Terms—All relevant statistics for GO-terms from the GO-enrichment analysis ran on TRN genes found in TRN vs. DOM and TRN vs. SUB comparisons. Table P in S1 File: WGCNA_ALL_MM—Module membership scores for all genes in each module for the WGCNA that included all subjects. Table Q in S1 File: WGCNA_ALL_MEs—Module Eigengene (PC1) scores for each sample for each module for the WGCNA that included all subjects. Table R in S1 File: WGCNA_TRN_MM—Module membership scores for all genes in each module for the WGCNA that included only animals that were reorganized (DES, ASC, DOM, SUB). Table S in S1 File: WGCNA_TRN_MEs—Module Eigengene (PC1) scores for each sample for each module for the WGCNA that included only animals that were reorganized (DES, ASC, DOM, SUB). Table T in S1 File: WGCNA_GO-Terms—All relevant statistics for GO-terms from the GO-enrichment analysis ran on WGCNA modules. GO-Terms can be found in Figs 4 and 6. Table U in S1 File: DES_DOMvsCDOM—Summary of reorganized genes showing significant fold changes in DES vs. CDOM and DOM vs. CDOM comparisons. Log fold change and eFDR values for each gene for each comparison provided. Table V in S1 File: ASC_SUBvsCSUB—Summary of reorganized genes showing significant fold changes in ASC vs. CSUB and SUB vs. CSUB comparisons. Log fold change and eFDR values for each gene for each comparison provided. Table W in S1 File: Reorganized_GO-Terms—All relevant statistics for GO-terms from the GO-enrichment analysis ran on reorganized genes found in DES+DOM vs. CDOM or ASC+SUB vs. CSUB comparisons.
(XLSX)