Replication materials for: Translating Supervisory Guidance into Thirteen Arguments a Community Health Insurance Scheme Can Compute

Replication materials for a study that translates international supervisory, actuarial and practitioner guidance on community-based health insurance into thirteen arguments a scheme can compute or decide before it opens. Four sources describe what a voluntary pool must know: a practitioner handbook of performance indicators, the international supervisory standard for inclusive insurance, the actuarial profession's risk book, and a published capital-requirements model. Between them they name thirteen arguments. Eight are computable, decidable or given before a scheme opens, with the means such schemes have; three are estimable from comparable schemes and then observed; two arrive only with running. The willingness-to-pay survey, the instrument the field uses instead, reaches one of the thirteen: an enrolment forecast whose nearest tests measure first enrolment, often under a fee waiver, and which no published study has set against what the same households later paid at full price. This deposit holds the evidence for that account. THE LITERATURE SEARCH, IN THREE ARMS. Arm 1, PubMed and Europe PMC, 12 June 2026: 11,110 records retrieved, 4,855 unique, 190 priority records on title and abstract, 156 after de-duplication. Arm 2, OpenAlex, Crossref and the Directory of Open Access Journals, 5 August 2026: 1,817 records, 1,385 unique, 719 carrying both language sets, 188 priority, 57 with a stated-versus-actual signal. Arm 3, new in this version, follows citations rather than keywords: every record citing, and every record cited by, twelve anchor studies, from OpenAlex and Semantic Scholar. That returned 2,899 records, 1,672 unique, of which 1,636 had not appeared in either database arm; 324 carried both willingness-to-pay and health-insurance language; abstracts were retrieved for 261; four met all three screening criteria and three were read in full. EVERY DISPOSITION IS PUBLISHED. For arm 1, all 156 priority records with authors, year, journal, identifier, disposition and the reason for it, ordered by relevance: 55 read in full and 101 screened out. For arm 3, all 324 screened records with the same fields, including the 63 for which no abstract could be retrieved from any source, which are recorded as unscreened rather than as excluded. No record in either set was set aside without a stated reason. THE HOUSEHOLD EVIDENCE. Willingness to pay elicited from 7,874 households in six rural Indian districts under a common protocol between 2008 and 2010. The correlation and regression workbooks from which every reported coefficient can be reproduced are deposited. The household-level survey records are not: they were collected under ethics approvals and grant conditions that predate current open-data practice, by an institution that has since closed without assigning rights in its data. ALSO INCLUDED. Replication scripts, a codebook, a provenance map, the external-numbers provenance note, a replication report, and the manuscript's reference list with identifiers. CHANGES IN 2.3.0. Adds the citation search arm in full: the records retrieved, the disposition and reason for each of the 324 screened, the four read in full, and a README describing the anchors, the method, the counts and the limits. Updates the title, citation metadata and manifest. Nothing carried in 2.2.0 has been altered or removed. FUNDING. The household survey was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), WOTRO Integrated Programme grant W 01.65.309.00, and by unrestricted core funding to the Micro Insurance Academy from Hivos (Netherlands), for which no project identifier was issued. Additional survey funding was provided by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) through AWO International, by the Madhyam Foundation Orissa, and by the Micro Insurance Academy.