Paper V - Distributed AGI Alignment as a Public Good v4

Current AGI alignment efforts assume a winner-take-all race. This assumption is mathematically incoherent. The CELL Series research programme—anchored in a peer-reviewed foundational paper (Kain, 2026a, Journal of Psychiatry and Psychological Sciences, Vol. 2 Iss. 1, pp. 104–113)—demonstrates that alignment is not a property of any isolated system but of the relational field between multiple divergent agents. Across four papers and convergent independent support from the Unified Dimensional Instability Principle (UDIP), the programme translates formal mathematical work into five concrete social benefits: (I) preventing alignment capture, (II) ending the compute arms race, (III) enabling real-time early warning systems, (IV) reframing antitrust as safety policy, and (V) creating the role of public relational stewards. The framework is a theoretical proposal supported by longitudinal simulation and one published peer-reviewed foundation; empirical validation of governance claims requires open collaboration. All falsification conditions are stated. All materials are available for independent replication and critique.