Data Sheet 1_Efficacy and safety of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to first-line standard therapy for recurrent or advanced cervical cancer: a meta-analysis of phase 3 clinical trials.docx
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-05-02 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Efficacy_and_safety_of_adding_immune_checkpoint_inhibitors_to_first-line_standard_therapy_for_recurrent_or_advanced_cervical_cancer_a_meta-analysis_of_phase_3_clinical_trials_docx/27978939
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with standard therapy (ST) have emerged as a novel treatment strategy for recurrent or advanced cervical cancer (r/a CC). However, the available data from phase 3 clinical trials have yielded mixed results. This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of adding ICIs to ST in the treatment of r/a CC.
MethodsData from four phase 3 clinical trials (KEYNOTE-826, CALLA, BEATcc, and ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18), involving 2,857 patients, were analyzed. Meta-analyses were conducted to combine hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), odds ratios (ORs) for the objective response rate (ORR), and relative risks (RRs) for adverse events (AEs).
ResultsThe addition of ICIs to ST significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.75), OS (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75), and ORR (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.13-1.94) compared to ST alone. However, there was a modest increase in grade 3-5 AEs (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13) with the combined therapy.
ConclusionThis meta-analysis indicates that the combination of ICIs with ST in the treatment of r/a CC not only demonstrates superior efficacy over ST alone but also maintains a comparable toxicity profile, offering strong evidence for an effective and relatively safe treatment approach for managing this disease.
Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024593895.
创建时间:
2024-12-06



