Supporting evidence and interpretive mappings for a knowledge transformation methodology across emerging digital energy systems

This dataset accompanies the article “A Knowledge Transformation Methodology for Translating Regulatory and Scientific Evidence into Engineering Specifications across Emerging Digital Energy Systems”. The Excel workbook documents the secondary evidence and interpretive mappings used in the selected FlexBIT and CEEGS examples. It contains six worksheets: Mappings records the connections between source evidence, engineering objectives, interpreted requirements, and documented design arrangements or published constraints. Evidence records source locations, paraphrased findings, numerical values, units, and limitations. Sources identifies the supplied documents and distinguishes sources used in the analysis from documents retained for context or excluded from the selected examples. Assessment documents the scope of the qualitative examination against completeness, traceability, consistency, transferability, and reproducibility. Coverage distinguishes the proposed URKM domains and UERM categories from those illustrated by the selected examples. Readme explains the extraction and interpretation methods, conventions, and limitations. The workbook includes 16 evidence records and 16 interpretive mappings. Published geological screening criteria and reservoir modelling findings are attributed to their original sources. No new reservoir simulations, geological screening calculations, participant data collection, or statistical analyses were performed. The mappings document the interpretation presented in the accompanying article. They do not establish that the original project decisions were made using URKM and UERM or that all model domains and categories were evaluated. Original source publications are identified but are not redistributed with this dataset.