Table 10 in A taxonomic revision of ten whitefish species from the lakes Lucerne, Sarnen, Sempach and Zug, Switzerland, with descriptions of seven new species (Teleostei, Coregonidae)

Table 10. The first- and second-best ratios retrieved from the LDA ratio extractor of pair-wise comparisons of all or a subset of head and body characters of the contemporary specimens from the species of lakes Lucerne and Sarnen. For some comparisons only a subset of characters could be used (a-j); the respective characters that were included are listed at the end of the table. δ is a measure of how good shape discriminates in comparison to size (i.e., the smaller the less allometry). Ratios marked with an asterisk * have very little (not more than one specimen of one species overlaps with the other species) or no overlap and were thus eligible for use in the species key and the diagnoses. Species comparisonBest ratioRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (shape vs. size)C. litoralis vs. C. intermundia (a)PreD/ED *10.89-12.759.92-10.5919.50.17SN/M *1.17-1.391.02-1.1718.950.18C. litoralis vs. C. suspensus (b)CD/UJW *1.74-1.971.5-1.6811.980.27CD/PreD *0.16-0.180.15-0.1611.430.28C. litoralis vs. C. nobilis (c)CD/PostD *0.17-0.210.14-0.1654.780.06PecF2/DFAe *0.84-0.920.94-1.1054.520.06C. litoralis vs. C. muelleri (d)CD/ED *1.87-2.251.12-1.4334.610.24HD/SW *4.45-5.553.45-4.4533.840.25Species comparisonBest ratioRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (shape vs. size)C. intermundia vs. C. suspensus (e)PreD/ED *9.92-10.5910.73-11.414.960.01C. intermundia vs. C. nobilis (f)CD/HW *0.77-0.870.63-0.7713.810.06C. intermundia vs. C. muelleri (g)CD/ED *1.53-1.841.12-1.4316.580.28Species comparisonBest ratioRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (shape vs. size)C. suspensus vs. C. nobilis (h)PecFB/CD *0.41-0.430.45-0.5249.760.02C. suspensus vs. C. muelleri (i)PreD/ED *10.73-11.48.17-9.63280.19BD/LJ *2.71-3.332.01-2.6327.460.2Species comparisonBest ratioRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (shape vs. size)C. nobilis vs. C. muelleri (j)ED/HD *0.27-0.330.35-0.4229.850.21Species comparisonBest ratioRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (shape vs. size)C. sarnensis vs. C. litoralis (k)ED/HD *0.33-0.390.25-0.3099.330.04C. sarnensis vs. C. intermundia (l)SL/ED16.29-21.6720.59-24.0419.60.07C. sarnensis vs. C. suspensus (m)PreD/ED *7.42-10.2110.73-11.407.240.17PelvF/PreA *0.20-0.240.20-0.216.560.17C. sarnensis vs. C. nobilis (n)PostD/EC *5.94-7.947.87-9.7714.280.14Multispecies comparisonC. muelleri vs. C. intermundia + C. nobilis (o)TL/ED *21.37-24.6524.45-29.599.750.40 (a) PecF2, DFB, DFAe, DFAd, DFPe, CD, CL, PAdC, DHL, PreP, PreA, PreD, PostD, SN, ED, EH, HL, MW, UJ, LJ, M, SW, HW, UJW, ES (b) DFAe, CD, PAdC, DHL, PreP, PreA, PreD, PostD, SN, ED, HL, MW, UJ, LJ, M, UJW (c) PelvF, PecF2, DFB, DFAe, DFAd, DFPe, AFAe, AdFB, CD, CL, PAdC, DHL, PreP, PreA, SL, PreD, PostD, SN, ED, EC, EH, HL, HD, MW, UJ, LJ, M, SW, HW, IOW, UJW, ES (d) all characters except PelvFS, SL, INW, CF, TL (e) PelvFB, CD, DHL, PreP, PreA, PreD, PostD, SN, ED, HL, MW, UJ, LJ, M, SD, UJW, ES (f) PelvF, PecF2, DFB, DFAe, DFAd, DFPe, AFAe, CD, CL, PAdC, DHL, PreP, PreA, PreD, BD, PostD, SN, ED, EH, PostO, HL, HD, MW, UJ, LJ, M, SW, HW, IOW, LJW, UJW, ES (g) all characters except CF, TL (h) PelvFB, PELVF, PECFB, PECF2, DFAe, CD, CL, DHL, PreP, PreA, PreD, BD, SN, ED, PostO, MW, LJ, M, SD, SW, IOW, INW, LJW (i) PelvF, PecF2, DFB, DFAe, DFAd, DFPe, AFB, AFAe, CD, CL, PAdC, DHL, PreP, PreA, PreD, BD, PostD, SN, ED, EH, PostO, HD, HL, MW, UJ, LJ, M, SD, SW, HW, IOW, UJW, ES (j) PelvF, PecF2, DFAe, DFAd, AFB, AFAe, CD, CL, DHL, PreP, PreD, BD, PostD, SN, ED, PostO, HL, HD, LJ, M, SD, SW, HW, IOW, UJW, ES (k) all characters except TL, CF, EC, PecF1, AdFB (l) all characters except TL, CF, EC, PecF1 (m) PelvFB, PelvF, PecFB, PecF2, DFAe, CD, CL, DHL, PreP, PreA, PreD, BD, SN, ED, PostO, MW, LJ, M, SD, SW, IOW, INW, LJW (n) all characters (o) all characters.