Supplementary materials to: Biased problem distributions in assignments parallel those in textbooks: Evidence from fraction and decimal arithmetic
收藏PsychArchives2022-01-20 更新2026-04-25 收录
下载链接:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/4754
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Supplementary materials to: Tian, J., Leib, E. R., Griger, C., Oppenzato, C. O., & Siegler, R. S. (2022). Biased problem distributions in assignments parallel those in textbooks: Evidence from fraction and decimal arithmetic. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.6365 Appendix A. Tables A1 – A3, percentages of each type of fraction arithmetic problems in GO Math!, enVisionmath, and Everyday Mathematics (adapted from Braithwaite et al., 2017). Appendix B. Table B, percentages of each type of fraction arithmetic and decimal arithmetic problems in the classroom assignments, calculated by averaging across the percentages of each type of problems from each teacher. Appendix C. Tables C1 and C2, percentages of each type of fraction arithmetic and decimal arithmetic problems in the classroom assignments. Appendix D. Grade level analyses of problems in the textbooks and the assignments.
提供机构:
PsychOpen GOLD
创建时间:
2022-01-20



