five

Safety and Efficacy of Biodegradable Drug-Eluting vs. Bare Metal Stents: A Meta-Analysis from Randomized Trials

收藏
Figshare2016-01-15 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Safety_and_Efficacy_of_Biodegradable_Drug_Eluting_vs_Bare_Metal_Stents_A_Meta_Analysis_from_Randomized_Trials_/1063191
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
BackgroundBiodegradable polymeric coatings have been proposed as a promising strategy to enhance biocompatibility and improve the delayed healing in the vessel. However, the efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) vs. bare metal stents (BMS) are unknown. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of BP-DES vs. BMS.Methods and ResultsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for randomized clinical trials, until December 2013, that compared any of approved BP-DES and BMS. Efficacy endpoints were target-vessel revascularization (TVR), target-lesion revascularization (TLR) and in-stent late loss (ISLL). Safety endpoints were death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis (DST). The meta-analysis included 7 RCTs with 2,409 patients. As compared with BMS, there was a significantly reduced TVR (OR [95% CI] = 0.37 [0.28–0.50]), ISLL (OR [95% CI] = −0.41 [−0.48–0.34]) and TLR (OR [95% CI] = 0.38 [0.27–0.52]) in BP-DES patients. However, there were no difference for safety outcomes between BP-DES and BMS.ConclusionsBP-DES is more effective in reducing ISLL, TVR and TLR, as safe as standard BMS with regard to death, ST and MI. Further large RCTs with long-term follow-up are warranted to better define the relative merits of BP-DES.
创建时间:
2016-01-15
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务