Interdisciplinary Potential of Culturological Attribution
收藏doi.org2025-03-25 收录
下载链接:
http://doi.org/10.17632/hfmgf6f7kw.1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
The legitimation of culturology in the totality of sciences is due, inter alia, to its meta-theoretical potential, which is expanding as the methodological tools develop.
Due to the post-nonclassical expansion of system concepts in the XXI century. methodological pluralism is affirmed, which requires dialectical-dialogical overcoming of differences in order to build a general scientific picture of the world. As applied to the theory of communication, it was proposed by R. Craig, but it can be synthesized with the "widely used, but poorly reflected" method of cultural attribution (A.Y. Flier). The synthesis is based on the thesis that terminological clarification (“culturological attribution”) allows attributing the subject of research not only in a separate culture, but in the aggregate of cultural locations, including various theoretical traditions.
文化学在科学整体中的正当性,部分得益于其元理论的潜能,该潜能随着方法论工具的发展而不断扩展。得益于二十一世紀后非古典系统概念的拓展,方法论多元主义得到确认,这要求通过辩证对话的方式克服差异,以构建一个普遍的科学世界观。将此应用于传播理论,由R. Craig提出,但可以与‘广泛使用但反思不足’的文化归属方法(A.Y. Flier)相结合。这种综合基于如下论点:术语的阐明(‘文化学归属’)不仅允许在单独的文化中归属研究对象,而且允许在包括各种理论传统在内的文化位置集合中归属研究对象。
提供机构:
doi.org



