Evaluation of the influence of chronic low-dose radiation on DNA repair gene polymorphisms [<i>XRCC1</i>, <i>XRCC3, PRKDC (XRCC7), LIG1</i>, <i>NEIL1</i>] in individuals from normal and high level natural radiation areas of Kerala Coast
收藏资源简介:
<b>Background:</b> Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) at DNA repair genes are considered as potential biomarkers of radio-sensitivity. The coastal belt of Kerala in south west India has a patchy distribution of monazite in its beach sand that contains Th-232 and its decay products. Thus, radiation levels in this area vary from <1.0mGy to 45.0mGy/year. The areas with external gamma radiation dose >1.5mGy/year are considered as High-Level Natural Radiation Areas (HLNRA) and ≤ 1.5mGy/year are Normal Level Natural Radiation Area (NLNRA). <b>Objective:</b> In the present study, an attempt was made to evaluate the influence of chronic low dose radiation exposure on DNA repair gene polymorphisms in NLNRA and HLNRA population of Kerala coast. <b>Materials and methods:</b> Genomic DNA was isolated from venous blood samples of 246 random, healthy individuals (NLNRA, <i>N</i> = 104; HLNRA, <i>N</i> = 142) and genotyping of five SNPs such as X-ray repair cross complementing 1(<i>XRCC1 Arg399Gln</i>), X-ray repair cross complementing 3 (<i>XRCC3 Thr241Met</i>], Protein kinase, DNA-activated, catalytic subunit (<i>PRKDC</i>) (X-ray repair cross-complementing group 7, <i>XRCC7 G/T</i>), nei like DNA glycosylase 1 (<i>NEIL1 G/T</i>) and DNA ligase 1 (<i>LIG1 A/C</i>) was carried out using PCR based restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) followed by silver staining. <b>Results:</b> Our results showed no significant difference in genotype frequencies in HLNRA vs NLNRA at three of the five SNPs studied i.e. <i>XRCC1 Arg399Gln</i> (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>(2)</sub> = 5.85, <i>p</i> = .054), <i>XRCC3 Thr241Met</i> (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>(1)</sub> = 0.71, <i>p</i> = .339), <i>PRKDC</i> (<i>XRCC7</i> G/T) (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>(2)</sub> = 3.72, <i>p</i> = .156), whereas significant difference was observed at <i>NEIL1 G/T</i> (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>(2)</sub> =8.71, <i>p</i> = .013) and <i>LIG1</i> A/C (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>(2)</sub> = 7.66, <i>p</i> = .022). The odds of heterozygote to homozygote genotypes in HLNRA relative to NLNRA at <i>XRCC1</i> Arg399Gln (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.13–3.40), <i>XRCC3</i> Thr241Met (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.41–1.31), <i>PRKDC (XRCC7 G/T),</i> (OR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.48–1.38), <i>NEIL1 G/T</i> (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.31–0.96) and <i>LIG1 A/C</i> (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 0.97–2.69) was also not significantly different in HLNRA vs NLNRA, except at <i>XRCC1</i> and <i>NEIL1.</i> <b>Conclusion:</b> The genotype frequencies at three of these SNPs i.e. <i>XRCC1 Arg399Gln, XRCC3 Thr241Met</i> and <i>PRKDC</i> (<i>XRCC7 G/T</i>) were similar, whereas <i>NEIL1 G/T</i> and <i>LIG1 A/C</i> showed significant difference between HLNRA and NLNRA population. However, further research using more number of SNPs in a larger cohort is required in this study area.



