Two Dispositions, Two Functions: A Functional Account of Dogmatic Cognition and Dark Personality in Online Financial Influence

This record is a reproducibility archive for “Two Dispositions, Two Functions: A Functional Account of Dogmatic Cognition and Dark Personality in Online Financial Influence.” The associated work is a narrative review and theoretical synthesis of online financial influence. It reorganises the evidence into four functional rungs—evaluation, selection, commitment, and production—and distinguishes established findings from a proposed same-sample double-dissociation test concerning dogmatic cognition and dark personality. The review covers 84 full-text sources. Three codings were completed, including two blind independent recodings. Published-source coding produced Fleiss kappa = .808; four no-majority cases are retained and explicitly disclosed under the stated fallback rule. The archive contains the manuscript and editable source, the online appendix and editable source, search and screening materials, per-source annotations, coding instruments and returned codes, reliability calculations, the APA 7 reference list, the list of requested but unobtained sources, and the fixed-seed power-design output. The deposited scripts are: apa7.py — APA 7 reference formatting and normalisation.appendix_data.py — construction of appendix tables from the coded materials.audit_cites.py — citation and reference-consistency checks.audit_recency.py — recency and date-audit checks.build_coding_sheet.py — generation of the original coding instrument.build_coding_sheet_v2.py — generation of the revised coding instrument used for the final package.build_deposit.py — assembly and validation of the deposit package.power_design_v17.py — fixed-seed Monte Carlo joint-power calculation for the proposed successor study.score_coding.py — coding-score and agreement calculations.score_coding_v3.py — final coding-score and reliability calculations.to_latex.py — conversion of structured source data into LaTeX tables and appendix material. The power files describe a proposed future study only. They are not participant results. Under the stated planning assumptions, the design targets N = 3,200 analyzable cases and N = 3,765 recruited cases after allowing for 15% attrition or exclusion, with simultaneous power of .905 for the prespecified contrasts and equivalence tests. No human participants were recruited for this review. The archive contains no participant-level data and no participant-level secondary analysis. It contains published-study metadata, study-level coding, derived annotations, reproducibility scripts, and design-simulation outputs. Published source articles remain subject to their original copyright and are not relicensed by this record. The complete manuscript, appendix, coding materials, analysis scripts, and supporting files are deposited together so that the evidence map, coding decisions, reliability calculations, and successor-study specification can be inspected and reproduced.