S1 Text - Comparative Impact of Integrated Palliative Care vs. Standard Care on the Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

S1 Fig. The Cochrane RoB 2 tool provides a detailed assessment across various domains to compare the effects of integrated palliative care versus standard care on cancer patients’ quality of life. S1 Table. The findings follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, available as a supplementary file. S2 Table. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist is used to evaluate the comparative impact of integrated palliative care vs. standard care on the quality of life in cancer patients. S3 Table. Dataset for a study conducted on Comparative Impact of Integrated Palliative Care vs. Standard Care on the Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. S4 Table. A numbered table of all studies identified in the literature search, including those that were excluded from the analyses. (ZIP)