Replication Data for: "Substantive representation: Explaining the adoption of Indigenous rights legislation in Latin America"

Online Appendix and Replication Material (Data + Do-File) for the Article “Substantive representation: Explaining the adoption of Indigenous rights legislation in Latin America” When using the data, please cite this article (https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2025.15) The dataset used for this article is based on the INDILEX database. It contains yearly information about the number of Indigenous articles adopted in each country since 1979. Article Abstract: Indigenous peoples belong to the most underprivileged groups worldwide. To address this situation, countries in Latin America and beyond increasingly recognize Indigenous rights constitutionally. However, these constitutional rights are not implemented equally everywhere. This could relate to the corresponding ordinary law – or lack thereof. Here I ask: Under what conditions are Indigenous peoples represented in ordinary legislation? To answer this question, I collected the original INDILEX dataset on the status of Indigenous peoples and their rights in the legislation of sixteen Latin American countries (1979-2018). Building on the political representation literature, I contrast descriptive representation with political allies, social movements, and favourable context factors as determinants of the substantive representation of Indigenous peoples. The analysis shows that leftist presidents and a broad constitutional mandate are key predictors for Indigenous rights legislation. The role of Indigenous civil society and democracy depends on time frame and operationalization choice.