five

2021 - IFAD-EU/CCAFS CSA Monitoring: Basona Werana Climate-Smart Village (Ethiopia)

收藏
DataCite Commons2025-05-11 更新2025-05-17 收录
下载链接:
https://dataverse.harvard.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/B4TX9L
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
<p align="justify"> This dataset contains the files produced in the implementation of the “Integrated Monitoring Framework for Climate-Smart Agriculture” in the Basona Werana Climate Smart Village (Ethiopia) in February 2021.</p> <br> This monitoring framework developed by CCAFS is meant to be deployed annually across the global network of Climate-Smart Villages to gather field-based evidence by tracking the progress on: <br> <ul> <li>adoption of CSA practices and technologies, as well as access to climate information services and <li>their related impacts at household level and farm level </ul> <br> The CSA framework allows to address three key research questions: <br> <ol> <li value="1">Who within each CSV community adopts which CSA technologies and practices and which are their motivations, enabling factors? To which extent farmers access and use climate information services? </li> <li value="2">Which are the gender-disaggregated perceived effects of CSA options on farmers’ livelihood, agricultural, food security and adaptive capacity, and on key gender dimensions (participation in decision making, participation in CSA implementation and dis-adoption, control and access over resources and labour). </li> <li value="3">Which are the CSA performance, synergies and trade-offs found at farm level? </li> <br> (Note that this 3d. question was not addressed in this specific Basona Werana 2021 monitoring, as farm level data were not collected) <br> <p align="justify"> The CSA framework proposes a small set of standard Core Indicators linked to the research questions, and Extended indicators covering aspects related to the enabling environment. <br> At household level (17 Core indicators):</p> <br> <ul type="circle"> <li>7 Core Uptake indicators (they track CSA Implementation and adoption drivers; CSA dis-adoption and drivers; Access to climate information services and agro-advisories, Capacity to use them and constraining factors).</li> <li>10 Core Outcome indicators (they track farmers perceptions on the effects of CSA practices on their Livelihoods, Food Security and Adaptive Capacity and on Gender dimensions. <br> Those include namely: CSA effect on yield/production, on Income, on Improved Food Access and Food Diversity, on Vulnerability to weather related shocks and on Changes in agricultural activities induced by access to climate information.</li> </ul> <br> <p align="justify"> Four are Gender related Outcome indicators (Decision-making on CSA implementation or dis-adoption, Participation in CSA implementation, CSA effect on labor, Decision making and control on CSA generated income). </p> <br> <ul type="circle"> <li>An additional set of complementary Extended indicators allows to determine and track changes in enabling conditions and farmers characteristics such as: Livelihood security, Financial enablers, Food security, Frecuency of climate events, Coping strategies, Risk Mitigation Actions, Access to financial services and Training, CSA Knowledge and Learning.</li> <br> At farm level, 7 CORE indicators <li>7 Core indicators are used to determine the CSA performance of the farms as well as synergies and trade-offs among the three pillars (productivity, adaptation and mitigation, via farm model analysis).</li> </ul> <br> <p align="justify"> This integrated framework is associated with a cost-effective data collection App (Geofarmer) that allowed capturing information in almost real time. The survey questionnaire is structured around different thematic modules. </p> <br> For the implementation in the context of the EU-IFAD/CCAFS project, some slight changes were made to the questionnaire in order to focus the data collection on tackling: <br> <ul type="circle"> <li>The impacts of Climate events</li> <li>Farmers’ access and use of CIS</li> <li>Farmer’s implementation of CSA practices, and</li> <li>the perceived household level outcomes related to the implementation of CSA practices in the two targetted Ethiopian CSVs.</li> </ul> <br> The adjusted survey questionnaire includes the following thematic modules: <br> -M1A Demographic (few additional questions not included in the “MASTER” CSA monitoring questionnaire were added coming from Rhomis) <br> -M1D Financial services (reduced set of original questions from the Financial Master) <br> -M2, Climate events (no changes made) <br> -M3, Climate Information Services <br> -M5, CSA practices (no changes made) <br> <p align="justify">** The Module Food Security from the Master questionnaire of the CSA framework was not included. Information on Food security captured using RhOMIS.</p>
提供机构:
Harvard Dataverse
创建时间:
2021-03-26
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务