<b>Revisiting the Central Dogma: the distinct roles of genome, methylation, transcription, and translation on protein expression in</b><b> </b><b><i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i></b>

<b>Background</b><b> </b>We investigated the flow of information from genome sequence to protein expression implied by the Central Dogma, to determine the impact of intermediate genomic levels in plants.<b>Results</b><b> </b>We performed genomic profiling of rosettes in two <i>Arabidopsis</i> accessions, Col-0 and Can-0, and assembled their genomes using long reads and chromatin interaction data. We measured gene and protein expression in biological replicates grown in a controlled environment, also measuring CpG methylation, ribosome-associated transcript levels and tRNA abundance. Each omic level is highly reproducible between biological replicates and between accessions despite their 0.5% sequence divergence; the single best predictor of any level in one accession is the corresponding level in the other. Within each accession, gene codon frequencies accurately model both mRNA and protein expression. The effects of a codon on mRNA and protein expression are highly correlated but are unrelated to genome-wide codon frequencies or to tRNA levels which instead match genome-wide amino acid frequencies. Ribosome-associated transcripts closely track mRNA levels.<b>Conclusions</b><b> </b>In the absence of environmental perturbation, neither methylation, tRNA nor ribosome-associated transcript levels add appreciable information about constitutive protein abundance beyond that in DNA codon frequencies and mRNA expression levels. The impact of constitutive gbM is mostly explained by gene codon composition. tRNA abundance tracks overall amino acid demand. However, genetic differences between accessions associate with differential gbM by inflating differential expression variation. Our data show that the Central Dogma holds only if both sequence and abundance information in mRNA are considered.