five

DataSheet_1_Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer Surveillance Among BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: A Systematic Review.doc

收藏
frontiersin.figshare.com2023-06-04 更新2025-01-09 收录
下载链接:
https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/DataSheet_1_Cost-Effectiveness_Analysis_of_Imaging_Modalities_for_Breast_Cancer_Surveillance_Among_BRCA1_2_Mutation_Carriers_A_Systematic_Review_doc/18104420/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
BackgroundBRCA1/2 mutation carriers are suggested with regular breast cancer surveillance screening strategies using mammography with supplementary MRI as an adjunct tool in Western countries. From a cost-effectiveness perspective, however, the benefits of screening modalities remain controversial among different mutated genes and screening schedules.MethodsWe searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to collect and compare the results of different cost-effectiveness analyses. A simulated model was used to predict the impact of screening strategies in the target group on cost, life-year gained, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).ResultsNine cost-effectiveness studies were included. Combined mammography and MRI strategy is cost-effective in BRCA1 mutation carriers for the middle-aged group (age 35 to 54). BRCA2 mutation carriers are less likely to benefit from adjunct MRI screening, which implies that mammography alone would be sufficient from a cost-effectiveness perspective, regardless of dense breast cancer.ConclusionsPrecision screening strategies among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers should be conducted according to the acceptable ICER, i.e., a combination of mammography and MRI for BRCA1 mutation carriers and mammography alone for BRCA2 mutation carriers.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO, identifier CRD42020205471.

背景:在西方国家,建议对BRCA1/2基因突变携带者采用常规的乳腺癌监测筛查策略,包括乳腺摄影,并辅以MRI作为辅助工具。然而,从成本效益的角度来看,不同突变基因和筛查方案下筛查方式的优势仍存在争议。方法:我们对MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行了检索,以收集和比较不同成本效益分析的结果。使用模拟模型预测针对目标群体采用筛查策略对成本、生命年增加、质量调整生命年以及增量成本效益比(ICER)的影响。结果:纳入了九项成本效益研究。对于中年组(35至54岁)的BRCA1基因突变携带者,乳腺摄影和MRI联合策略是成本效益的。BRCA2基因突变携带者不太可能从辅助MRI筛查中获益,这表明从成本效益的角度来看,单独的乳腺摄影就足够了,无论乳腺密度如何。结论:针对BRCA1/2基因突变携带者的精确筛查策略应根据可接受的ICER进行,即对于BRCA1基因突变携带者为乳腺摄影和MRI的联合,对于BRCA2基因突变携带者为单独的乳腺摄影。系统评价注册:PROSPERO,标识符CRD42020205471。
提供机构:
Frontiers
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务