five

Data for 'The conservatism of prairie pollinators according to experts and empiricism'

收藏
DataCite Commons2025-05-19 更新2025-04-16 收录
下载链接:
https://databank.illinois.edu/datasets/IDB-7822394
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Includes two files (.csv) behind all analyses and results in the paper published with the same title. <b>1) 'sites.species.counts'</b> is the raw 2018-2022 data from Angella Moorehouse (Illinois Nature Preserves Commission) including her 456 identified pollinator species and her raw counts per site (there may be a few errors of identification or naming, and there will always be name changes over time). Headers in columns F through Q correspond to the remnant-site labels in Figure 1 and Table 1 of the paper. Columns R to AB are the “nonremnant” sites, which have not been uniquely labelled since the specific sites aren't referenced anywhere in the manuscript. <b>2) 'C.scores'</b> has the 265 species assigned empirical C values (empirical.C) along with the four sets of expert C values and their confidence ranks (low, medium, high), and the Illinois/Indiana conservation ranks (S-ranks), following the methods described in the paper. Other headers in these files: - taxa.code: four-letter abbreviation for genus and specific name - genus: genus name - species: specific epithet - common.name: English name - group: general pollinator taxa group - empirical.C: empirically estimated conservatism score - expert#.C: conservatism score assigned by each of four experts - expert#.conf: expert's confidence in their conservatism score Blank cells in the site-species abundance matrix indicates species absence (or non-detection) Blank cells in C.scores.csv indicates missing S-ranks and unassigned C-scores (with associated missing confidence ranks) where experts lacked knowledge or confidence
提供机构:
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
创建时间:
2025-02-24
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务