Data for 'A Quantitative Integrative Review of Personal Jurisdiction In Romans 1 Legal Exegesis And Its Implications On Christian Gentile Homonegative Doctrines.'

Data for the publication entitled \"A Quantitative Integrative Review of Personal Jurisdiction In Romans 1 Legal Exegesis And Its Implications On Christian Gentile Homonegative Doctrines.\" It comprises the dataset for the quantitative integrative review of N=110 scholastic sources, the results show the barrier likely arose because 97.3 percent of homonegative exegesis is silent regarding Moses’ and NT personal jurisdiction (“PJ”) statements; that silence results in an overinclusive argument that likely incorrectly implicates Gentile Christian homosexuality. More specifically, homonegative exegesis does four things: (1) 97 percent of exegetes omit citations and discussion of Moses’ PJ that limit Moses’ Gentile reach to “resident aliens” within Israel (e.g., Leviticus 18:2, 26, 20:2), (2) 92 percent of exegetes do not discuss Acts 10; 15:5-29, and 21:25, which reiterate Moses’ PJ that exclude Gentiles from homosexual proscriptions, (3), 88.18 percent of scholars employ a different interpretive method to determine whom Romans 1 addresses than employed for the remainder of their analysis, and (4) 88.7 percent of exegetes engage ipse dixit when stating that the Romans 1 audience is Gentile, when structural analysis and contextual evidence reflects that Paul addressed a Jewish audience concerning Jewish beliefs. Consequently, this research expatiates relevant PJ from Moses, NT, Didascalia, Halakha, Roman Law, and reflections of American Law, adds the same to Romans 1 exegesis, and the results—though unexpected—supports the thesis that when added Romans 1 forms no scriptural basis for Gentile Christian homonegative doctrine.