five

Reliability of FEV1/FEV6 to Diagnose Airflow Obstruction Compared with FEV1/FVC: The PLATINO Longitudinal Study

收藏
Figshare2016-01-18 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Reliability_of_FEV_1_FEV_6_to_Diagnose_Airflow_Obstruction_Compared_with_FEV_1_FVC_The_PLATINO_Longitudinal_Study/761418
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
QUESTIONA 6-second spirometry test is easier than full exhalations. We compared the reliability of the ratio of the Forced expiratory volume in 1 second/Forced expiratory volume in 6 seconds (FEV1/FEV6) to the ratio of the FEV1/Forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) for the detection of airway obstruction.METHODSThe PLATINO population-based survey in individuals aged 40 years and over designed to estimate the prevalence of post-Bronchodilator airway obstruction repeated for the same study participants after 5–9 years in three Latin-American cities.RESULTSUsing the FEV1/FVC1/FEV6 to define airway obstruction, the changes in prevalence were smaller: 9.7 to 10.6% in Montevideo, 8.6 to 9.0% in São Paulo, and 7.5 to 7.9% in Santiago. Changes in the prevalence of COPD with criteria based on FEV1/FVC correlated strongly with changes in the FET of the tests (R2 0.92) unlike the prevalence based on a low FEV1/FEV6 (R2 = 0.40).CONCLUSIONThe FEV1/FEV6 is a more reliable index than FEV1/FVC because FVC varies with the duration of the forced exhalation. Reporting FET and FEV1/FEV61/FVC-derived indices.
创建时间:
2016-01-18
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务