Table 3 in Morphometrics highlights subspecies differentiation of continental (Rangifer t. tarandus) and insular (Rangifer t. platyrhynchus) Norwegian reindeer

Table 3: Pairwise comparison of continental populations and insular reindeer subpopulations in isometric size and Log Shape Ratio for the distal and proximal parts of the metatarsal and metacarpal.
ProximalDistalHardangervidda aColesdalenGrøndalenSassendalenHardangervidda aColesdalenGrøndalenSassendalenMetacarpeHardangervidda a–0.401410.000890.00451–0.0120.0240.066Colesdalen0.00018–0.022630.082851.9e-7–0.5730.478GrØndalen0.000450.65390–0.721771.9e-70.99–0.670Sassendalen5.7e-60.124950.04323–1.9e-70.600.60–MetatarseHardangervidda a–1.2e-141.2e-147.3e-10–0.350.830.34Colesdalen0.023–0.830.837.7e-8–0.340.64GrØndalen0.0231–0.875.5e-80.75–0.34Sassendalen4.2e-50.0230.023–3.2e-80.250.1–
p-Value of the size comparisons are in the lower hemi-matrices while the p-values for LSR comparisons are in the upper hemi-matrices.Significant p-value are presented in bold.p-Value were corrected for multitest comparison for each pairwise analysis separately. a Continental population. Bold values mean significant tests.