in Tressoldi et al 2014 (version 1)

Supplementary materials for my review of Tressoldi et al. 2014. "Brain-to-Brain (mind-to-mind) interaction at distance: a confirmatory study" version 1.<br><br>Arbitrarily chosen stimulus labels can be decoded equally well as the real stimulus: <br>Here I analysed raw data from the "Receiver" in Pair 1 using non-linear SVM classification with a RBF kernel (k-nearest neighbour classifier with k=3 produces similar results). The black boxcar line indicates the stimulus labels used to decode (1=signal, 0=silence). The red dots denote classification for each time point. The overall decoding accuracy is shown above each plot.<br><br>Three sets of stimulus labels were used: <br><br>ActualStimulus: the actual stimulus labels used in the experiment with one signal period in the middle of the session. FakeStimulus1: an arbitrarily chosen signal period that does not overlap the true signal period. FakeStimulus2: arbitrarily chosen stimulus labels that alternates between signal and silence over the course of the session.