Additional file 1 of Identification of influential probe types in epigenetic predictions of human traits: implications for microarray design
收藏Figshare2022-08-11 更新2026-04-08 收录
下载链接：
https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Additional_file_1_of_Identification_of_influential_probe_types_in_epigenetic_predictions_of_human_traits_implications_for_microarray_design/20469629/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务：
资源简介：
Additional file 1: Table S1. Demographic and summary data for Set 1 and Set 2 - Generation Scotland. Table S2. REML analyses - primary probe sets (non-mQTL probes). Table S3. REML analyses—permuted probe sets. Table S4. DNAm-based prediction analyses—primary probe sets (non-mQTL probes). Table S5. R2 estimates from linear DNAm-based predictors in the literature. Table S6. DNAm-based prediction analyses—permuted sets. Table S7. REML for chronological age. Table S8. DNAm-based prediction of chronological age. Table S9. Enrichment of genomic features in highly variable sites. Table S10. Description of probe sets compared in variance component and prediction analyses. Table S11. REML—mQTL probes vs. non-mQTL probes. Table S12. REML—EWAS Catalog probes vs. non-mQTL probes. Table S13. REML—hypo- and hypermethylated probes vs. non-mQTL probes. Table S14. REML for chronological age—sensitivity analyses. Table S15. DNAm-based prediction—mQTL probes vs. non-mQTL probes. Table S16. DNAm-based prediction—EWAS Catalog probes vs. non-mQTL probes. Table S17. DNAm-based prediction—hypo- and hypermethylated probes vs. non-mQTL probes. Table S18. DNAm-based prediction of chronological age—sensitivity analyses.
提供机构：
Hillary, Robert F.; McCartney, Daniel L.; Horvath, Steve; McRae, Allan F.; Walker, Rosie M.; Marioni, Riccardo E.; Porteous, David J.; Evans, Kathryn L.; Hayward, Caroline; Campbell, Archie
创建时间：
2022-08-11
