Expert-based literature review on RRI indicators for science education assessment: PERFORM analysis matrix

The document contains the main variables and categories of analysis of the expert-based literature review conducted as part of the assessment impact developed in the PERFORM project. This literature review globally aimed to identify and characterize assessment frameworks used in the context of science learning and engagement with young people. Specifically, it examined the operationalization of: i) RRI values and process requirements, ii) transversal competences, iii) experiential aspects, and iv) cognitive aspects. In doing that assessment gaps and challenges where identified relevant to the context of PERFORM and, more broadly, to the development of science education assessments incorporating the RRI dimension. By assessment framework we refer to a set of interlinked criteria, practices and concepts providing a systematic way of data collection, analysis and interpretation to the study of science learning and engagement. The template for data collection was organised in different sections approaching the following specific review questions and sub-questions: What assessment frameworks can be identified in the selected sample? On which disciplines are they based? What is being assessed in these frameworks? How it is the evaluation conducted? What are the challenges of each approach for assessing science learning and engagement? How are transversal competences, RRI and emotional factors included in these frameworks? How are these notions operationalised? What kinds of evaluation indicators are applied for data collection, if any?