Fagaceae collection

This fileset includes matrices, analysis files and artwork relating to inferences and discussions about phylogenetic relationships in extant and extinct Fagaceae. See <b>readme.txt</b> in each archive for content and labelling conventions.<br><br><i><b>Version 1</b></i>Data, inferences, and exemplary artwork relevant for testing believes expressed in <br>Wilf P, Nixon KC, Gandolfo MA, Cúneo RA (2019). Eocene Fagaceae from Patagonia and Gondwanan legacy in Asian rainforests. <i>Science </i><b>364, </b>972based on a "phylogenetic analysis" of seven morphological traits.<i>Ockham's Razor applied but not used: can we do DNA-scaffolding with seven characters?</i><i>Why we want to map trait evolution on networks, pt. 1 – Introduction; pt. 2 – Topological ambiguity.</i><i><br></i><i><b>Version 2</b><br></i>Morphology folder updated.<i>Surviving parsimonists: just tree-naive or tree-blindfolded?<br></i><i><br></i><i><b>Version 3</b></i>Added <b>Jiang et al. 2021 revisited.7z</b>—reconstructed (phased) haplotype data produced by Jiang et al. (2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12695) for 28 nuclear gene regions; de-constructed into the putative original, high-polymorphic (2ISP-rich) sequence data, i.e. one sequence per individual instead of two phased (hypothetical) haplotypes.<br><i>A fully resolved, and perfectly misleading, species tree</i> <br><br><i><b>Version 4</b></i>Added artwork (<b>AllesBastarde...png</b>; language: Deutsch/ German) relating to/ after<br>Cardoni et al. (2022; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.26.433057)and literature cited therein.<br>