Replication Data for: The Provision of Insurance? Judicial Independence and the Post-tenure Fate of Leaders

Leading explanations of judicial independence argue political competition incentivizes those in power to create independent courts as insurance against uncertain futures. While much work addresses the role competition plays, little analyzes the fundamental assumption that courts provide political insurance. I offer an original hypothesis as to how independent courts provide insurance against post-tenure punishment and test this using data on post-tenure fate of leaders from 1960-2004. Results show independence is associated with significantly higher probabilities of unpunished posttenure fate. The article builds on and extend existing political insurance explanations, and offers the first test of one of their critical assumptions.