five

Comparison of the significant trends (p ≤ 0.05) when analyzed for 6 different factors.

收藏
Figshare2015-12-02 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Comparison_of_the_significant_trends_p_0_05_when_analyzed_for_6_different_factors_/385373
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Trends with two categories were tested using either the t-test (normal data) or the Mann-Whitney test (non-normal data): Ice Extent (2007), Geography (Franklin Bay [FB] vs. open-ocean stations), Season (summer vs. fall) and searching for a difference within vs. between groups for the # shared OTUs. Trends with three categories were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test (non-parametric version of ANOVA): Photosynthetically-Active Radiation (PAR; low vs. medium vs. high) and Chl a Distribution (picoplankton-dominated vs. shared vs. nanoplankton-dominated). The temporal trends (over 8 years, 2003–2010) were tested using linear regression (normal data) or the Spearman Rank correlation (non-normal data). Only those trends showing statistical significance out of the parameters tested are shown. Differences are indicated as either: overall percent increases (+X%) or decreases (−X%) for the two Ice Extent categories; FB more or less abundant than open-ocean for Geography; increasing or decreasing linear trends (r value) over the 8 Years; or “ns” for non-significant. For the # of shared OTUs it is a little different: using the example of Ice Extent, each sample from 2007 (between the groups). If the community structure is the same, they should share the same # of OTUs within vs. between groups. However, if there is a significant difference (≠), then there has been a change in structure. For the linear decreasing trends, this implies that the more years separating samples, the less OTUs they share – indicating change in community structure over time. See Supplementary Table S5 for the assignments of the 11 samples into each of the respective categories.
创建时间:
2015-12-02
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务