Bonding and Reactivity of a Pair of Neutral and Cationic Heterobimetallic RuZn2 Complexes

A combined experimental and computational study of the structure and reactivity of two [RuZn2Me2] complexes, neutral [Ru­(PPh3)­(Ph2PC6H4)2(ZnMe)2] (2) and cationic [Ru­(PPh3)2(Ph2PC6H4)­(ZnMe)2]­[BArF4] ([BArF4] = [B­{3,5-(CF3)2C6H3}4]) (3), is presented. Structural and computational analyses indicate these complexes are best formulated as containing discrete ZnMe ligands in which direct Ru–Zn bonding is complemented by weaker Zn···Zn interactions. The latter are stronger in 2, and both complexes exhibit an additional Zn···Caryl interaction with a cyclometalated phosphine ligand, this being stronger in 3. Both 2 and 3 show diverse reactivity under thermolysis and with Lewis bases (PnBu3, PCy3, and IMes). With 3, all three Lewis bases result in the loss of [ZnMe]+. In contrast, 2 undergoes PPh3 substitution with PnBu3, but with IMes, loss of ZnMe2 occurs to form [Ru­(PPh3)­(C6H4PPh2)­(C6H4PPhC6H4Zn­(IMes))­H] (7). The reaction of 3 with H2 affords the cationic trihydride complex [Ru­(PPh3)2(ZnMe)2(H)3]­[BArF4] (12). Computational analyses indicate that both 12 and 7 feature bridging hydrides that are biased toward Ru over Zn.