Does bimodal hearing increase self-assessed abilities and hearing outcomes when compared to unilateral cochlear implantation?

<b>Objective:</b> The primary objective of this study was to compare the applicability and benefit of providing unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users with a contralateral hearing aid (HA). <b>Design:</b> This retrospective (case-control) study was conducted in a hospital-based CI centre. Participants self-assessed their hearing via two questionnaires (SSQ₁₂ and HISQUI₁₉). Objective postoperative speech perception was assessed via aided thresholds and speech perception tests (monosyllabic words, disyllabic words, and sentences) in quiet and noise. <b>Study sample:</b> A CI-only group (n = 113, mean age 55.1 ± 14.2 years) and a bimodal group (n = 50, mean age 56.7 ± 15.2) participated in the study. <b>Results:</b> No significant difference in SSQ₁₂ or HISQUI₁₉ scores was observed between groups. The bimodal group had a significantly better aided hearing level (<i>p</i> = 0.020) and speech discrimination score (<i>p</i> = 0.019). <b>Conclusions:</b> Bimodal (CI + HA) users have significantly better speech understanding than unilateral CI-only users, although this benefit may not be reflected in self-assessed outcomes. Counselling about bimodal hearing must cover expectations about potential benefits.