Compliance Ratings (Waste and Installations)

This record holds data from 2015 to 2022. Previous years data is available on request.

We use compliance ratings to help assess the risks from a regulated facility.

An operator’s compliance record will affect whether they pay a subsistence charge that is higher or lower than the base charge. We will calculate a compliance rating for an operator based on their compliance record.
We calculate a compliance rating after a permit has been issued and use a standard approach called the Compliance Classification Scheme to classify permit breaches.
A compliance rating only applies to a permit for a waste operation or installation.
It does not apply to farming installations operated by members of the our Pig and Poultry Assurance Scheme, or waste mobile plant.

We identify and record any non-compliances in the course of a calendar year – January to December. We use this information to work out a compliance rating based on a points system. For permits that cover more than one activity, the compliance rating will apply to the whole permit.
We convert permit breaches into a points system. We add the points from each breach to calculate an annual total of non-compliance points.
We allocate points based on the amount of extra work we usually have to do when dealing with different types of permit breaches.

CCS Category breach 1 (most serious) 60 points
CCS Category breach 2 (serious) 31 points
CCS Category breach 3 (less serious) 4 points
CCS Category breach 4 (minor) 0.1 points

Based on the cumulative score over a calendar year, we place each site into one of six compliance bands A to F.
Band A 0 points Discount of 5% on subsistence charge
Band B 0.1-10 points No impact on subsistence charge
Band C 10.1-30 points 10% increase on subsistence charge
Band D 30.1-60 points 25% increase on subsistence charge
Band E 60.1-149.9 points 50% increase on subsistence charge
Band F 150+ points 200% increase on subsistence charge

CHANGES TO THIS DATASET
This dataset was previously provided in the Opra record. The Opra scheme has now been replaced by a new charging scheme. Attribution statement: © Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2024. All rights reserved.

本记录包含2015年至2022年的数据。对于过往年份的数据，可根据需求提供。
我们采用合规评分来帮助评估受监管设施的风险。
操作者的合规记录将影响其是否支付高于或低于基础费用的生计费用。我们将根据操作者的合规记录计算其合规评分。
在颁发许可证后，我们将通过一种称为合规分类方案的标准方法来计算合规评分，并用于对许可证违规行为进行分类。
合规评分仅适用于废物操作或安装的许可证，不适用于由我们猪和家禽保证计划成员运营的农业设施或废物移动设备。
在日历年度内——即从一月到十二月，我们将识别和记录任何违规行为。我们利用这些信息，根据积分系统计算出合规评分。对于涵盖多个活动的许可证，合规评分将适用于整个许可证。
我们将许可证违规行为转换为积分系统。我们将每个违规行为的积分相加，以计算出年度非合规积分总和。
我们根据处理不同类型许可证违规行为时通常需要额外完成的工作量来分配积分。
CCS类别违规1（最严重）- 60分
CCS类别违规2（严重）- 31分
CCS类别违规3（较轻）- 4分
CCS类别违规4（轻微）- 0.1分
基于日历年度的累积得分，我们将每个站点划分为A至F六个合规等级之一。
等级A - 0分 - 生计费用享受5%的折扣
等级B - 0.1-10分 - 对生计费用无影响
等级C - 10.1-30分 - 生计费用增加10%
等级D - 30.1-60分 - 生计费用增加25%
等级E - 60.1-149.9分 - 生计费用增加50%
等级F - 150分以上 - 生计费用增加200%
本数据集的变更
此数据集之前提供在Opra记录中。Opra方案现已由新的收费方案取代。归属声明：©环境署版权和/或数据库权利2024。保留所有权利。